FIXcast: The Next Generation of Nuclear Energy

In this new podcast episode from 'FIXcast,' host Samantha Laine and Monitor staff David Unger discuss nuclear energy – and the biggest signs of progress in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.

'FIXcast,' a podcast on progress from The Christian Science Monitor.

Five years ago, one of the largest nuclear disasters occurred at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan, causing devastating damage to the surrounding area. While the disaster was largely initiated by an earthquake-triggered tsunami, the incident pushed the risk and safety associated with nuclear energy into the limelight. After Fukushima, it raised the question: Are the risks of producing nuclear energy worth the benefits?  

As we look at development in the nuclear sector over the last five years, there are certain signs of progress that are beginning to break through the fear and provide glimpses into the industry's potential. A new generation of young, motivated nuclear engineers is addressing the industry's biggest roadblocks—and developing technology that could lead to safer, more efficient nuclear energy and a carbon-free world.

In the latest episode from "FIXcast," the Monitor's podcast on progress, staff Samantha Laine and David Unger discuss the pros and cons of nuclear energy and its current state of development. They are joined by Josh Freed of the DC-based think tank Third Way and Ashley Finan of Clean Air Task Force in Cambridge to discuss the biggest challenges surrounding nuclear energy – as well as the innovation that brings nuclear energy into a promising new light.

Click here to listen to the podcast on iTunes.

Did you enjoy this episode? Want more podcasts on progress? Please let us know what you think.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.