Are e-cigarette companies intentionally trying to hook teens? CDC says so.

The electronic cigarette industry says its products are 'sold to adults by adults,' but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says advertisers are wooing teens with the same tactics that combustible cigarettes companies are barred from using.

Mike Segar/Reuters/File
Various e-cigarette products for sale are seen at the Henley Vaporium in New York City in this file photo taken Dec. 18, 2013.

Electronic cigarette companies are using a similar playbook to entice today's teens to try their products as tobacco companies used on their parents, and, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study released Tuesday, the tactic is working. 

In turn, the CDC is employing similar arguments and strategies against e-cigarettes as did for combustible cigarettes, but the e-cigarette industry insists that its products are safer.

E-cigarette companies spent $115 million on advertising in 2014, compared to $6.4 million in 2011, the CDC's National Youth Tobacco Survey found. And they feature familiar images of sex, rebellion, and gritty independence that got yesterday's teens smoking regular cigarettes. 

"The e-cigarette advertising we're seeing is like the old-time Wild West," CDC Director Tom Frieden told Reuters. "No rules, no regulations, and heavy spending advertising the products."

Nearly seven in 10 American teenagers saw an e-cigarette ad in 2014, whether in a store, on TV, online, or in a magazine or movie; and more middle school students and high schoolers now use e-cigarettes than regular cigarettes, according to the study. Some researchers say e-cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes, but others have found that the smokeless cigarettes can be harmful in different ways and urge additional research into the health implications of so-called vaping.

The debate over how many teens see the advertisements and then try the product because of them is a big one, and it is not likely to find its resolution in a study of a controversial product such as e-cigarettes. The prevailing logic, however, is if ads had no impact, the companies would not invest in them.

"The use of e-cigarettes in kids appears increasingly likely to result in an increased risk of using regular cigarettes," Mr. Frieden told Reuters. "They are not harmless."

For their part, e-cigarette companies resent the implications by the CDC. The Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association and Altria Group, which owns three tobacco companies, say they want restrictions on sales to minors, too.

"The CDC continues to mislead the public about the benefits of vapor products as far less harmful alternatives to smoking," Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association executive director, Cynthia Cabrera, said in a statement. "The CDC also fails to mention that teens are exposed to many other adult issues on the Internet, TV, and movies, such as violence, sex and alcohol."

She said e-cigarettes are a product "sold to adults by adults," but the CDC worries that without restrictions on advertising to teenagers, they will become another gateway drug for teenagers. 

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Are e-cigarette companies intentionally trying to hook teens? CDC says so.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today