Do Microsoft CEO Nadella's comments on women represent Silicon Valley culture?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella told a conference full of women that not asking for a raise is one of women’s 'superpowers' and helps to develop 'good karma.' Is this evidence that one of the most forward thinking industries is still largely an old boys club?

Manish Swarup/AP
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella speaks to students in New Delhi, Sept. 30. On Thursday, Mr. Nadella spoke at an event for women in computing held in Phoenix, saying women don't need to ask for a raise. They should just trust the system. He was asked to give his advice to women who are uncomfortable requesting a raise.

Microsoft head Satya Nadella launched into damage control Thursday night after telling predominantly female audience that women shouldn’t ask for raises, but instead trust the system to recognize their hard work.

“I answered that question completely wrong,” the chief executive officer told employees in an e-mail Thursday evening. “If you think you deserve a raise, you should just ask.”

That statement is drastically different from the one he offered Thursday morning at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing when interviewer Maria Klawe, president of Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, Calif., and a Microsoft director, asked what advice he might have for women who felt uncomfortable requesting a pay increase.

“It’s not really about asking for the raise, but knowing and having faith that the system will actually give you the right raises as you go along,” he replied.

The CEO went on to suggest that not asking for a raise is one of women’s “superpowers” and helps to develop "good karma."

Mr. Nadella’s statements underscore persistent criticism that the technology industry is unwelcoming to women. Women are significantly underrepresented in much of Silicon Valley. Only 29 percent of Microsoft employees are female, according the company’s latest figures, released earlier this month.

The suggestion that women demurely wait for recognition of a job well done essentially legitimizes and reinforces the persistent gap between men's and women’s pay, says Kellye Sheehan, president of Women in Technology, a Washington, D.C.-based professional association for women in the technology industry.

“Culturally, women are more likely to work quietly and assume someone will notice and then automatically reward them,” Ms. Sheehan says in an e-mail interview.

Researchers at the Carnegie Mellon University found in 2003 that women were eight times less likely than men to negotiate over salary, according to the Harvard Business Review.

More recently, researchers at the University of Texas found that women are not only less likely to negotiate for their salary, but also ask for an average of $7,000 less than men when they do, National Public Radio reported in April.

While the gender pay gap has narrowed significantly since 1980, when female employees earned an average of just $0.63 for every dollar earned by their male counterparts, women today still typically earn 16 percent less than men for the same job, according to Pew Research. The White House’s estimate is even higher, placing women’s pay, on average, at just 77 percent of that of men's.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.