Panera restaurants submit a 'no gun' request. Will the policy work?

Joining such chains as Starbucks and Chipotle, Panera's CEO 'respectfully' requests customers leave their guns at home to make the restaurants 'an everyday oasis.'

Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor/File
Lunch orders are filled for customers at Panera Bread bakery-café on June 18, 2012 in New York City.

When you come into a restaurant, it’s OK to bring baby wipes, a newspaper, hey, maybe even some concealed breath mints, but please, leave your guns behind.

That’s the message increasingly being sent out by restaurant chains and other consumer businesses, the latest example being Panera Bread.

“We're simply respectfully requesting that people leave their guns at home," Panera CEO Ron Shaich said in a phone interview with CNBC Monday. “We are building communities in our cafes and are where people come to catch a breath,” he said.

The move is the latest indication of how gun-rights politics has moved uncomfortably into eateries and other public places.

Gun-rights enthusiasts have sought to celebrate “open-carry” firearm laws by walking into businesses like Target and Starbucks with guns strapped to their belt or back. Not all the patrons feel comfortable with that – a point Mr. Shaich made when he described the move as a request to make the restaurant chain “an everyday oasis and not make this a battleground for political opinion.”

The group Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America thanked Panera for the new policy covering some 1,800 bakery-cafés in 40 states, saying the move “comes after months of discussions between Moms Demand Action and Panera.”

The group is also urging Kroger, a major operator of grocery and other retail stores across the US (including Ralph’s and Fred Meyer) to take similar action. Starbucks, Target, and Chipotle have announced similar policies over the past year designed to make their establishments gun free.

A catch: The policies are hard to enforce. Companies like Panera say it’s not fair to ask their employees to try to usher pistol-packing citizens out of their doors. Shaich framed the policy as a respectful request.

Similarly, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz said last year that the coffee vendor’s policy is not an outright ban.

“We want to give responsible gun owners the chance to respect our request,” he wrote in a open letter, adding that “enforcing a ban would potentially require our partners to confront armed customers, and that is not a role I am comfortable asking Starbucks partners to take on.”

Panera’s action may be aimed at keeping the restaurants free of gun politics, but the announcement prompted a predictable flare of protests as well as praise. Even as many Americans thanked the chain via Facebook or Twitter, many gun-rights advocates called Panera’s move unnecessary.

Some said they’ll boycott the chain. Others said they’ll make a point of eating at Panera frequently – with a visible firearm as a protest prop.

At the same time, not all gun-rights supporters are fans of “open carry” and of efforts to flaunt the public display of guns.

An editorial last fall in the Beaumont Enterprise, in Texas, called the 1995 legalization of concealed carrying of guns in the state “a long overdue affirmation of the Second Amendment,” but took a stand against open carry.

“When you see a civilian walking down the street or entering a store with an exposed gun, you don't know if that person is just showing off his hardware or planning to commit a crime. It's unsettling to many civilians, and it presents a special threat to law enforcement.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.