Why bankrupt Detroit wants to destroy nearly one-quarter of its houses

The Detroit population has declined so dramatically that the city has been left with a vast number of blighted properties. A new $850 million plan would destroy about 85,000 of them.

Rebecca Cook/Reuters/File
A fire hydrant is seen with an "Out of Service" sign on a blighted street on the east side of Detroit in this 2013. Wiping out abandoned and decrepit buildings could cost nearly $1 billion, according to a task force.

Detroit unveiled a plan Tuesday to destroy nearly 85,000 homes – some 22 percent of its entire housing stock – in a bid to ease urban blight and stimulate economic development.

The initial five-year program is expected to cost $850 million, but that price tag could increase to $2 billion if the city targets industrial properties that contain hazardous materials.  

Reducing blight is seen as crucial to Detroit’s revival. Previous administrations have had to deal with maintaining a city whose urban shell has become far too large for its current decreasing population. That has left officials to merely manage blighted neighborhoods instead of using that money to encourage growth and reinvestment.

“Detroit needs to be focused on offense and what [it] could be. You can only get there when you get rid of all this … blight,” said Dan Gilbert, founder of Quicken Loans and part of the task force of federal officials, city officials, and business leaders organized last fall to address the blight crisis.

Once a city of more than 2 million people, Detroit now has fewer than 700,000. The exodus played into Detroit’s fiscal crisis, which resulted in it being the largest American city to declare bankruptcy.

Its restructuring plan, if approved by a federal judge, will commit nearly $500 million of the city’s budget to the blight initiative, said Kevyn Orr, the city’s state-appointed emergency financial manager. The balance of the money is expected to be raised from private businesses and philanthropy groups during the coming year.

Unless blight is dealt with, Mr. Orr added, investors will not feel comfortable bringing their money to the city.

“The analysis has been done over time that blight is either a conduit or a contagion. If you don’t get at blight, you don’t get at public safety, you don’t get at economic development,” he said.

The initial $850 million focuses on residential housing and small-scale commercial buildings, where the demolition cost per structure is estimated at $10,000. The 300-page report released Tuesday says that sum could increase to nearly $2 billion if larger-scale commercial and industrial sites are addressed, due to the additional cost of asbestos and lead abatement.

The plan is not the first to address blight in Detroit, but city officials say it is the largest and most aggressive.

In September, President Obama pledged $320 million in federal, state, and private grants to help Detroit’s economic recovery. This included some money targeting blight.

Previous city administrations have also pledged to fight blight but have struggled with dwindling resources and political pushback. Former Mayor Dave Bing launched the most recent effort, pledging to remove 3,000 blighted homes by the end of his administration.

Current Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan said previous efforts lacked cooperation between federal, state, and local agencies, as well as the involvement of private investors and the community. To address the blight crisis, Mayor Duggan created a Department of Neighborhood, which consolidated and accelerated several programs, including the city’s home auction program, with strict timelines and guidelines.

The mayor’s efforts received a boost when JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s biggest bank, committed $100 million in loans and grants over 10 years to help in the city’s economic recovery, including $25 million toward blight removal, which will include loans for homeowners involved in the auction process.

“Once you have a strategy and momentum, money tends to follow,” Mayor Duggan said.

Duggan said that the blight removal process will not target only private landowners, but also will involve city buildings. For example, the 70 empty buildings owned by Detroit Public Schools represent the “single biggest source of blight on the community,” he said.

Most of the structures targeted for either demolition or remediation are residential (73,035), while the rest are overgrown vacant lots and non-residential structures like private businesses or churches.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.