Honey? I just landed my airplane on Lake Shore Drive.

Pilots say successful landings are those you can walk away from. John Pedersen proved this Sunday when he successfully landed his damaged airplane on Chicago's Lake Shore Drive.

Ashley Rezin/Chicago Sun-Times/REUTERS
Pilot John Pedersen discusses his plane's emergency landing on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago Sunday. The pilot, who was the only person on board, escaped unscathed, and no other injuries were reported, a police spokesman said.

“OK, you’ve just lost your engine. Where are you going to land?”

It’s the question every student pilot dreads but which every flight instructor asks at some point.

The instructor has just pulled the throttle back to idle, and the student has just seconds to set up an emergency landing – looking for a farmer’s field (land with the furrows, not across them, to reduce the risk of flipping over), a golf course, or a straight stretch of highway with no overpasses and as little traffic as possible.

Gravity rules. The aircraft will glide (or plummet) toward the ground. And assuming there’s no ejection seat or parachute, survival now depends on the pilot’s skills in quieting fear, judging the landscape below, and flying to a successful landing – defined now as one that can be walked away from.

In training, the instructor at some point well above impact throttles up the aircraft engine, then explains what the student did or didn’t do correctly.

(I still sweat remembering my own experience as a student naval aviator in Pensacola, Fla., 40-plus years ago. My instructor, who had otherwise indicated no sadistic tendencies, took control of the T-34 Navy trainer, flew a couple of stomach-churning loops and aileron rolls, leveled out upside-down, pulled the throttle back to idle and said, “You’ve got it. Where are you going to land?” I must have done something right, because a few training flights later he pronounced me “safe for solo.”)

John Pedersen had such an experience early Sunday morning.

He was flying his small Coyote II two-seater at about 2,000 feet over downtown Chicago when an external tail part broke loose, causing the aircraft to shake violently.

He radioed a “Mayday,” but knew he couldn’t make it to either Midway or O’Hare airports.

Down below was Lake Shore Drive.

Mr. Pedersen, a 51-year-old electrician who told the Chicago Tribune that he’d been flying for about five years, picked a spot, timed his approach to take advantage of a red traffic light when cars were stopped, and smoothly planted the aircraft on the roadway. Firefighters and police quickly arrived to help push the Coyote II onto the grass.

“Television crews soon started showing up, with reporters and cameramen crowding around the soft-spoken pilot clad in jeans and a hooded sweatshirt,” the newspaper reported. “Hands in his sweatshirt pockets, Pedersen described his flight from Schaumburg Airport to Lake Shore Drive, repeating it again as other reporters walked up to the scene.”

"It's a blessing," he said.

As reporters and bystanders crowded around, Pedersen cellphoned his fiancée to detail the location where she could fetch him.

“You can’t miss it,” he said, stating the obvious.

When Ileana Alvarez arrived, she teased him about his aviation pastime.

"He wants me to get on a plane with him," she joked to reporters. "Are you kidding me?"

But, she added, "As long as he's OK, that’s what matters to me."

There’s a first for everything, and this was Pedersen’s first flying emergency.

“There’s always a risk. I always look for a place to land,” he said. “That’s important. That’s probably what saved my life today.”

Pedersen owes his flight instructor a root beer float.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.