Final pitch for Obama, Romney: Which one will convince voters about 'change'?

Post-hurricane Sandy, both campaigns are back in full swing. Mitt Romney says he's the man who can take the nation on a different course, but President Obama says he, too, represents change.

Larry Downing/Reuters, Charles Dharapak/AP
In this combination of photos, President Obama and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney are shown speaking at campaign events on Thursday with five days to go before the election.

President Obama has brought “change” back to the heart of his pitch to voters, going toe to toe with Republican challenger Mitt Romney’s competing message that he represents real change. 

Five days before the election, and on the first full day of campaigning for both candidates since superstorm Sandy ripped up coastal New Jersey and New York City, the president and the ex-governor of Massachusetts are making their closing arguments. On Thursday, both spoke of the havoc wrought by the storm and expressed empathy for those who have suffered.

Mr. Romney urged donations to charities helping with storm relief. Mr. Obama revived a theme from his breakout speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, where he called on Americans to rise above partisanship. In Green Bay, Wis., Thursday, Obama spoke of Americans who have helped one another in response to Sandy.

“There are no Democrats or Republicans during a storm; there are just fellow Americans,” said Obama, fresh off a day with New Jersey’s Republican governor, Chris Christie, that was filled with mutual admiration.

But both Obama and Romney also quickly returned to attacking each other and tried to one-up each other on the theme of change. Obama reprised the Bush years – years, he said, of tax cuts for the wealthy and “free license” for Wall Street and the oil and insurance industries – and then accused Romney of “using all his talents as a salesman” to dress up the same “failed” policies as change.

“Well, let me tell you, Wisconsin, we know what change looks like,” said Obama, who made “hope and change” his mantra in 2008. “And what the governor is offering sure ain’t change.” 

Obama continued: “Giving more power back to the biggest banks isn’t change. Leaving millions without health insurance isn’t change. Another $5 trillion tax cut that favors the wealthy isn’t change. Turning Medicare into a voucher is change, but we don’t want that change.”  

Romney has been hammering on “change” since well before Sandy, an easier argument for him to make as the challenger to an incumbent president who has labored to bring America back from near economic collapse four years ago.

Romney called out Obama for going negative and small – for trying to save Big Bird and “then playing silly word games with my last name,” a reference to the “Romnesia” attack line that Obama and the Democrats have been using to portray Romney as a flip-flopper.

And the former businessman ridiculed Obama’s suggestion that he would appoint a “secretary of business” in a second term to consolidate government functions that support business.

“We don't need a secretary of business to understand business; we need a president who understands business, and I do,” Romney said, speaking in Roanoke, Va.

“This isn't a time for small measures,” he continued. “This is a time for greatness. This is a time for big change, for real change.”

Each candidate also sought to convince voters that he has a plan for the next four years. Romney has long been pitching his five-point plan, centered on energy, trade, job training, debt and deficits, and small business. That remains the heart of his final pitch to voters.

Two weeks ago, Obama came out with his plan for a second term in a 20-page brochure called, “A Plan for Jobs and Middle Class Security.” For a while, he boiled that down to a five-point plan in his stump speech, focused on tax reform, energy, education, deficit reduction, and infrastructure.

In his new closing-argument speech, Obama raises many of the same themes, but packages them more under the rubric of “change” rather than under a five-point plan, and with more populist overtones.

While Obama suggests Romney would be a champion in Washington for “the folks at the very top,” he promises to represent the people he meets every day on the campaign trail – the laid-off furniture worker who is retraining for a job in biotechnology, the auto worker who’s “back on the job,” the young teacher “doing her best in an overcrowded classroom.”

He ended by summoning the memory of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who governed during the Great Depression – and took well more than one term to get the nation back on its feet.

Romney went personal toward the end of his speech, something he has avoided through much of the campaign but has been doing more of lately. He spoke of his older sister Lynn, who is a widow with eight grown children, including 43-year-old Jeffrey, who has Down syndrome.

“I’ve watched Lynn throughout those 43 years do everything in her power to give him a fulfilled and abundant life,” Romney said. “She’s a hero because she gives of herself to someone else she loves.”

On Friday, the campaign will see what is likely to be the last outside factor that could influence votes: the release of the October unemployment figure by the Labor Department. But economists don’t expect a major change in the rate, currently at 7.8 percent, and so undecided voters probably have all the information they’re going to get as they head into the voting booths on Tuesday.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Final pitch for Obama, Romney: Which one will convince voters about 'change'?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today