FBI: Border patrol agent was killed by 'friendly fire'

One US border patrol agent was killed and another wounded in gunfire Tuesday along a well-known drug-trafficking corridor near the US-Mexican border. The FBI now says it was friendly fire.

Benjie Sanders/Arizona Daily Star/AP
US border patrol agents stand on top of their vehicles and look into Mexico west of Douglas, Ariz., after a border patrol agent was shot and killed and another wounded on Tuesday.

Three days after the shooting death of a US border patrol agent in southern Arizona, the FBI on Friday confirmed that "friendly fire" was to blame.

An ongoing investigation strongly points to the shooting that killed Agent Nicholas Ivie and injured a colleague as "the result of an accidental shooting incident involving only agents," the FBI said in a statement.

"The FBI is utilizing all necessary investigative, forensic, and analytical resources in the course of this investigation," the statement reads.

Authorities had disclosed little information about the circumstances surrounding the shooting that occurred just before 2 a.m. Tuesday.  Investigators have yet to shed light on what might have caused the gunfire eruption, or who might have fired first.

QUIZ: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

Mr. Ivie was one of three agents who had responded to a tripped ground sensor in a remote region of the state – about five miles north of the US-Mexican border – that is a well-known drug-trafficking corridor.

The wounded agent was treated and released from a hospital, while the third was unharmed.

Border patrol officials on Friday told reporters that Ivie's family was aware that his death was probably accidental.

"I explained to Agent Ivie's family that if the investigation ultimately reaches that conclusion, it changes none of the following facts," said Commander Jeffrey Self of the customs and border protection's joint field command in Arizona.

"That Agent Ivie gave the ultimate sacrifice and died serving his country. That he died in the line of duty and will be honored as such for his final act of service. That Agent Ivie served for more than six years protecting this country against those who threaten our way of life. That he will be remembered by all of us who served alongside him for his character, kindness and loyalty."

Like the 2010 shooting death of Border patrol agent Brian Terry in the southern part of the state, Ivie's killing again trained the spotlight on border security. Several politicians, including Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, quickly assailed the Obama administration's often-repeated assertion that the border is safer than it has ever been.

On Friday, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was in Arizona to meet with Ivie's family and law enforcement officials.

Meanwhile, those who worked with Ivie prepared to honor the fallen agent, who leaves behind a wife and two children.

A public memorial service is scheduled for Oct. 8 in Sierra Vista, Ariz., where he lived with his family.

QUIZ: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.