L.A. arson spree: Investigators drill down on motive

Harry Burkhart was arrested Monday in connection with the L.A. arson spree where more than 50 fires were started over four days. Pinpointing a motive is made difficult by ravaged crime scenes.

OnScene.tv/AP photo
In this image taken from video released on Monday by OnScene.tv, arson suspect Harry Burkhart, 24, a German national, is arrested in the Hollywood section of Los Angeles. Police declined to reveal any motive for more than 50 fires that have occurred since Friday in Hollywood, neighboring West Hollywood, and the San Fernando Valley, causing about $3 million in damage.

As more facts trickle in about the man accused of deliberately setting a wave of fires across Los Angeles, crime analysts are trying to zero in on a possible motive and what, if any, lessons can be learned by both law enforcement and the media. 

Harry Burkhart was arrested Monday in connection with more than 50 fires set over the course of 4 days.

Experts say that Mr. Burkhart's motives – even if stated – may never really be known. They could range from the political to the personal, and could involve everything from unresolved childhood issues, to thrill seeking, to besting the authorities in a cat and mouse game. Or all of the above.

And pinpointing a motive is made even more difficult by ravaged crime scenes.

“Arson is a very difficult crime to investigate and prove because a lot of evidence is destroyed,” says Robert Rowe, President of Pyrocop Inc., a fire forensics firm based in Long Beach. “Investigators need to be extremely diligent in building their case to guide a jury step by step.”

Still, there are clues that can lead investigators to a motive.

Judging by the age of the suspect, 24, some surmise that he acted alone and out of anger, as fits the pattern of younger arsonists. Older arsonists, however, typically operate with a profit motive – cashing in on insurance scams – and many times work in groups.

“Research shows that young arsonists have very low social skills and are attracted to the high, immediate emotional payoff of fires,” says Elizabeth Dowdell, a professor at the Villanova University College of Nursing in Pennsylvania with background in forensic research. “Fire is so destructive that it can give the instant gratification these people feel over a perceived wrong.”

Speculation shifted Tuesday night to Mr. Burkhart's mother, who reportedly faces 19 counts of fraud and embezzlement in Germany.

According to the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), Dorothee Burkhart has no legal immigration status now, having last entered the country lawfully in 2007.

A man who identified himself as Ms. Burkhart’s son appeared at a court hearing last week after the elder Burkhart had been taken into custody on an arrest warrant issued by German authorities. Demanding that she be let go, the son screamed and cursed, aiming at least one epithet at “the United States,” until court marshals removed him from the building, Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the United States attorney’s office in Los Angeles, told the Los Angeles Times Wednesday. The younger Burkhart was briefly detained, but not arrested.

Charged with one count of arson – though more are expected – Harry Burkhart is being held without bail and is scheduled to appear in court Wednesday. After his arrest Monday, ABC reported that Burkhart smiled and said, “I hate America.”

Police continued to look for other suspects who may be involved in the four-day arson spree. But no more fires have been reported since Mr. Burkhart’s arrest. 

Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca called whoever set the fires, “perhaps the most dangerous arsonist in the County of L.A. that I can recall.”

Media and law enforcement can learn lessons from the arson spree, analysts say.

Both perform a public disservice when they use such terms as "most,” "worst,” or “fastest” because that might feed the perpetrator’s need for grandiosity and spur others to make an even greater statement merely by topping them, says James Alan Fox, a criminologist at Northeastern University in Boston who studies serial crime.

“Records are made to be broken so I find it troubling when officials speak in those terms,” he says. Fox also discourages comments emphasizing the fires were set mere minutes apart. Such comments, he says, could encourage copycatting.

“There is a fine line between between shedding light on crime and spotlighting the criminal,” says Fox. One of the lessons, as he sees it, is that society should be careful about on the one hand making the criminal more important than he is, and on the other hand humanizing him too much. As the case has continued to attract global attention, Fox says, “You want to be sure not to go overboard in investigating and reporting the biographical sketches of such perpetrators.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to L.A. arson spree: Investigators drill down on motive
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today