In search of new words for new media?

Is a ‘movie’ still a movie if you watch it on your phone?

|
Sarah Philbrick
Coolidge Corner Theater in Brookline, MA, holds an annual science fiction movie festival.

A question arising from the correspondence folder: Do we need a new, or better, word for “movies” in this era when people watch them not only in the movie house but on the phone as they wait for a bus?

Whatever happened to cinematic glamour, anyway? Instead of palatial theaters we have Joe Average hitting the pause button in the middle of a movie to find out what’s delaying the No. 47.

Film has long been an aspirational synonym for “movie” – movie as “art,” in other words. At the beginning of the “feature presentation” (i.e., the thing you came to see as distinct from all the trailers) there is usually a screen that announces “A Film by [Director’s Name].” Note: It’s a “film,” not a “movie.”

But does it make a difference that films (or movies) are not on actual film anymore? Maybe not.

It may be useful to distinguish between genres and delivery systems. Some genres, and the terms for them, have proved remarkably sturdy, even as delivery systems evolve. 

Book once referred to a scroll, and then was applied to the collections of bound “signatures” familiar today. And a book on an e-reader is still a book, however different the reading experience.

Record has been a similarly flexible term, remaining in use as technology has evolved from wax cylinders to compact discs. “Articles” may be online or in a dog-eared magazine. Academics organizing conferences still call for “papers,” even though they get digital files in response.

Digital, of course, referred first to fingers and then to types of clocks. But it also means “of or relating to information that is stored in the form of the numbers 0 and 1.” This reference to two numbers instead of 10 suggests that a better term would have been pollical, from the adjective derived from pollex, the technical term for thumb (or big toe). It would acknowledge all those thumb typists who have transformed our online culture. But I digress.

We might say that movie and film are two terms for a distinct genre, built on traditions of theater but made possible by a cinematic technology, which has continued to evolve. Video (from the Latin “I see”) has come in as a new genre built on another kind of new technology. I have a hunch we’ll be talking about “movies” and “films,” and distinguishing them from “videos,” for some time to come.

True story: Making my way through Harvard Square the other day, I heard behind me the voices of (I gathered) a female undergraduate and a somewhat older man – an uncle? A family friend who hasn’t seen her in a while? I sensed he was trying to avoid sounding like a fuddy-duddy. He asked, “Do you actually have paper books in your classes anymore?”

Oh, yes, she answered; she reads actual books all the time. And in fact, she added, “I print out all my course readings. I can’t stand to read on the computer!”

In some cases, it’s not just the genres that live on longer than you might expect; it’s the delivery mechanisms, too.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In search of new words for new media?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Verbal-Energy/2015/0219/In-search-of-new-words-for-new-media
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe