American Idol: Five reasons why Harry Connick, Jr. could give show a lift

American Idol premiered their 13th season on Wednesday night, welcoming back past judges Jennifer Lopez and Keith Urban and new judge Harry Connick, Jr.. 

Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
Harry Connick, Jr., Jennifer Lopez, Ryan Seacrest, and Keith Urban arrive at the American Idol XIII premiere event, on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2014 in Los Angeles.

On Wednesday night, American Idol kicked off its 13th season. Interestingly, American Idol began the same year as this writer's marriage; thirteen whole years ago. Sometimes, it feels like it was only yesterday when we stood breathless with the excitement of beginning a new journey. At other times, it feels like . . . well, it feels like you have to boot Randy Jackson and Nigel Lythgoe and add a little Harry Connick, Jr. to spice things up. In fact, after Wednesday night's show, it's apparent that adding a little Harry Connick, Jr. could solve much of what ails the world.

It might be premature to declare Harry as Idol's saving grace (maybe that pun was slightly intended) but after his Idol premiere, it's safe to say that he might just be the best judge to fill that seat since Mr. Cowell departed four seasons ago. So what was it that made Connick such a great asset to the show? You're going to be so glad you asked.

1) He has, quite possibly, the bluest eyes on earth. What? You need more?

2) He is remarkably astute and actually knows what he's talking about. While Jennifer Lopez is all about her "goosies" and Keith Urban listens with his heart, Harry Connick Jr. listens critically. So much so, that he even takes the time to explain to Jennifer and Keith about the pervasiveness of the pentatonic scale and how some singers rely too heavily on those five notes. Needless to say, JLo stared at him like he had a pentahead.

3) He is irreverent and hilarious. Unlike Randy Jackson and Steven Tyler, who spent an entire season mooning over how beautiful Jennifer Lopez was, Harry Connick Jr. frequently disagrees with her and uttered the best eight words spoken in thirteen years of Idol: "Jennifer, I will slap you on national television." 

4) He effortlessly cradles contestants and Keith Urban in his arms, as if they were mere babes.

5) He isn't afraid to be honest. While Harry isn't needlessly cruel toward contestants, he doesn't coddle them either. 

Because of the above reasons and because of the natural, healthy dynamic that seems to emanate from the judging panel, it seems like Season 13 could be just what viewers need to wipe the horrors of last year's panel from our minds. And that's exactly what Idol is hoping for. To help grease the wheels of their new, bright image, Idol opted to forego the carnage of failed auditions and instead relied on really funny moments, like Ryan Seacrest face planting in the carpet after trying to jump over a chair or Ryan Seacrest face planting a contestant's father when he tried to pick him up. That's good wholesome fun, right there.

To add to the delights of the new judge and the absence of Mariah (a delight, in and of itself), Idol also showcased a few promising talents from their Boston and Austin auditions such as Sam Woolf, 17, who gave a great rendition of "Lego House," Malcolm Allen, 21, who sang "Superstition" and finally Ethan Thompson, who sang an unfamiliar song but was still able to leave an indelible impression! Bonus points to the readers who can identify the song in the comments section.

As promising as the addition of Harry and the new affable panel may be, it's too soon to tell whether these or any of the other changes in store, will be enough to rescue Idol from their steady decline in viewership. But if Season 13 is American Idol's last gasp, taking it with Harry Connick, Jr., will make it that much sweeter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.