'Siberia' TV show gets discouraging ratings while 'Under the Dome' flourishes

The 'Siberia' TV show, a scripted program centered on a fictitious reality show which is airing on NBC, got lackluster ratings for its series premiere, while 'Under the Dome' was the top-rated program. The 'Siberia' TV show premiered July 1.

CBS Entertainment/AP
The 'Siberia' TV show was beaten in the ratings by the CBS program 'Under the Dome,' which stars Natalie Martinez (l.) and Josh Carter (r.).

On a Monday night when fewer watched television because of the holiday week, NBC's new scripted version of a reality show "Siberia" got off to a discouraging start, while "Under the Dome" slipped from last week's impressive premiere ratings but was still the top-rated show and delivered a win for CBS, according to preliminary numbers.

CBS was first place in both the advertiser-sought 18-49 demographic with a 1.8/5 and in total viewers with 7.1 million. The network aired repeats aside from "Under the Dome" at 10 p.m. The Stephen King series dipped 15 percent from last week's premiere for a still-strong 2.8/8 – the night's highest performance in the demo – and drew 11.5 million total viewers, making it the most-watched program of the night.

ABC was second in ratings and total viewers with a 1.6/5 and 5.5 million. "The Bachelorette" at 8 was down 10 percent from last week for a 1.8/6, and took 6.3 million total viewers. The freshman drama "Mistresses" had a 1.1/3 and 3.8 million total viewers.

NBC took third place in the demo and total viewers with a 1.5/5 and 4.4 million. The season premiere of "American Ninja Warrior" at 9 was off 29 percent from last May's premiere with a 1.7/5 and had 4.9 million total viewers. The series premiere of "Siberia" at 10 took a 1.1/3 – a 35 percent drop from last August's premiere of "Stars Earn Stripes" – and had 3.2 million total viewers.

Univision was fourth in ratings and total viewers with a 1.4/4 and 3.5 million, while Telemundo was fifth in the demo and total viewers with a 0.7/2 and 1.6 million.

Fox drew sixth in ratings and total viewers with a 0.6/2 and 1.6 million. The network aired repeats aside from "The Goodwin Games" at 8:30. It had a 0.6/2 and 1.5 million total viewers.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.