What's the best TV sitcom of all time? Help us decide!

We've narrowed the field down to 20 contenders. What do you think is the best TV sitcom ever?

L: (from l. to r.) Michael Richards, Jason Alexander, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, and Jerry Seinfeld star in Seinfeld. R: Lucille Ball stars in 'I Love Lucy.'

From the "show about nothing" to Lucy and Ricky's groundbreaking comedy to a poignant and funny look at doctors working during the Korean War, TV has produced various stellar sitcoms over the decades. These shows have not only entertained audiences but also changed Hollywood and society. "I Love Lucy" invented re-runs, now an industry staple. "All in the Family" challenged society's perceptions through the views of hero Archie Bunker. "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" showed home audiences the single woman life that was becoming a reality in America but not often discussed. "Roseanne" showed the struggles of a working-class family when TV ensembles were often more affluent.

Meanwhile, on the awards circuit, our contender "Frasier" currently holds the most Emmy awards, having secured a whopping 37 over its run. It broke the record held previously by poll competitor "The Mary Tyler Moore Show," which had won 29.

Of course, not every show can be an awards darling. Castaways comedy "Gilligan's Island" never received an Emmy nomination, while the medical comedy "Scrubs" was nominated but never secured an Emmy award. Time-warp program "That '70s Show" received one in 1999 for its costume design and was nominated several more times over its run, but only got its name called at the awards ceremony once.

But which of these shows is the best of all time? Monitor staff have winnowed the list down to 20 competitors for the crown, with 1951's "I Love Lucy" currently the earliest show and 2001's "Scrubs" serving as the newest contender. Vote in our poll below, which will be open through June 7, and then we'll compile an article based on your, the readers', rankings.

Have fun voting!

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.