Will Britney Spears and Demi Lovato revive The X Factor?

'The X Factor' aired its second season premiere on Wednesday night, marking the debut for new judges Demi Lovato and Britney Spears. Will Britney and Demi bring new life to The X Factor?

Fred Prouser / REUTERS
Judges from the reality series "The X Factor" (L-R) L.A. Reid, Britney Spears, Demi Lovato and Simon Cowell are pictured during a panel discussion at the Television Critics Association Summer press tour in Beverly Hills, California. On Wednesday, The X Factor premiered its second season.

On Wednesday, Season 2 of The X Factor premiered on FOX and finally debuted its new and much hyped additions to the judging panel, Demi Lovato and Britney Spears. Simon Cowell, in a move that was rather cliche for a middle-aged man, dumped last season's female judges Nicole Scherzinger and Paula Abdul and replaced them with younger versions of themselves.

Simon's motives for bringing in two younger female pop stars, both who have battled personal demons (though Britney's demon's got better publicity - Demi Lovato was hospitalized for treatment of emotional and drug issues in October of 2010) seemed, perhaps to the jaded pop culture cynic, pretty transparent. Simon wanted to attract younger viewers while also capitalizing on the country's fascination with Britney since her public breakdown. Plus, two young, emotionally damaged women would certainly pose no threat to the egos of he and L.A. Reid and they could continue to revel in being masters of the universe, in this humble blogger's opinion.

RELATED: Are you a real American Idol fan? Take the quiz

And, while those may have been Simon's primary reasons, last night's premiere suggested that there might have been a stroke of inspiration in his casting that was not immediately obvious to the public. While the show was rather heavy handed in its attempts to paint Britney as a shrewd and tough judge, even without the manipulation of the footage, Britney came to the table with purposefulness and offered honest critiques without feeling the need to hide behind empty platitudes. Demi, on the other hand, brought a certain charm and confidence to the the panel that was both unexpected and refreshing.

Also, in place of the patronizing and contentious SImon who has often treated his female co-stars with a disdain that borders on misogyny, there seemed to be an evolution into a kinder Simon.  In addition to offering unsolicited praise to Britney, "You're quite good at this," he muttered to her early on in the judging process, he later showed genuine concern for a visibly upset Britney who had just passed less than stellar judgement on a contestant she had once recorded with.

With Demi, Simon shares a playful chemistry that almost borders on paternal at times, like when he good-naturedly scolds her for being too enthusiastic about a cute contestant or when he questions her about her relationship with Niall Horan from New Direction. "Have you kissed him?" he asks a blushing and giggling Lovato.

While some of these developments are new and unexpected, the show did bring back its heavy-handed overproduction and, of course, the parade of contestants whose personal stories of struggle, inspiration, and adorable toddlers have become synonymous with every prime-time singing competition.

Some critics felt that The X Factor couldn't actually get much worse regardless of who was on the judging panel. While it is too soon to tell if the bounce from Demi's and Britney's debut will lead to any long-term excitement about the show, they have at least given viewers a reason to hope and after last season's debacle, that in and of itself is an impressive achievement.

The X Factor returns on Thursday night for part 2 of it's season premiere. Will Demi and Britney continue to impress? Will L.A. Reid actually get five seconds of air time? Will the judges continue to graze on mystery snacks throughout the auditions? Check back tomorrow for answers to those and more of your burning questions.

RELATED: Are you a real American Idol fan? Take the quiz

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.