Randy Jackson will be an American Idol judge, Take 12

Randy Jackson will indeed be joining his 'bestie' Mariah Carey on American Idol's judging panel. Will Randy Jackson be joined by Nicki Minaj and Keith Urban?

(Photo by Arnold Turner/Invision for BMI/AP Images)
American Idol judges Mariah Carey and Randy Jackson at the 2012 BMI Urban Awards in early Sept., 2012, in Beverly Hills, Calif. Who else will join the American Idol judging panel?

Despite earlier reports that Randy Jackson would be hanging up his judging cap, insiders (and Simon Cowell's Twitter feed) are now claiming that Randy Jackson will in fact join Mariah Carey on the judging panel for the 12th season of American Idol.

Why the sudden turn of events – aside from a desperate attempt to create drama and generate buzz in the off-season? Obviously producers recognized Mr. Jackson's unwavering devotion to the show, his innumerable contributions to the juggernaut that has defined a generation, his ability to astutely and succinctly provide priceless industry advice to fledgling artists, his . .  wait, what's that? Randy Jackson was a last minute fill-in after negotiations with Enrique Iglesias collapsed due to his demands for an eight-figure salary?

Well, it's great that Mr. Jackson is shrewd enough to not let his pride get in the way of another lucrative year on the judging panel. You can't teach an old dawg new tricks after all . . .

And, since we're on rumor overdrive, reports are that Nicki Minaj and Keith Urban are quite close to being confirmed as the third and, completely extraneous, fourth judges on the panel. A four-judge format is a questionable choice for Idol since their previous experiments with four judges seemed to weigh down a show that has been known to struggled with time-management issues even with three judges. But many of Idol's recent decisions seem to be directly influenced by the show's main competitors, FOX's The X-Factor and NBC's The Voice. The four-judge format, the rumored addition of Nicki Minaj (a direct response to The X-Factor's addition of two young, female pop artists to their judging panel) and the token, good-looking male country artist, Keith Urban also known as Blake Shelton 2.0.

While playing musical judging chairs might be a good way to keep American Idol in the viewer's collective unconscious, especially when The X-Factor and The Voice are battling for early-season supremacy, it doesn't necessarily mean that the results will prove beneficial to the show; a show that, in some respects, has been on full tilt since the fateful decision to bring on 4th judge Kara DioGuardi in Season 8; a change that seemed to herald the beginning of the end of the Randy-Simon-Paula magic.

In fact, keeping Randy Jackson as a judge may be the best decision Idol's made in quite a while. Despite his shortcomings (and there are many) he is the only tie to the magic that once propelled American Idol into the stratosphere and while evolution is necessary if the show wishes to remain current, staying current should never come at the expense of individuality. It is troubling that Idol's producers seem to be focusing more on what makes other shows successful rather than recognizing what made/makes them special. 

Will the additions of Carey, Minaj, and Urban recapture the magic of Idol's yesteryear? It seems highly unlikely, especially since the saturation of celebrity judges have shifted the focus of the entire genre. What was once a talent show about contestants has quickly become a platform for celebrities to further their careers, supplement their incomes and yes, to stroke their egos.

At least we still have our resident dawg. Who knew that someday Randy would come to embody all that was right with American Idol?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.