Post-‘Brexit,’ EU Youth Orchestra could continue

As the 'Brexit' referendum takes Britain out of the EU, one EU institution may have been saved.

Zervac Attila
A ‘Save EUYO' flash mob in Budapest, Hungary.

Forty years ago, three years after Britain joined what was then the European Economic Community, Lionel Bryer and his wife, Joy, both of the International Youth Foundation of Great Britain, had a dream: to found an orchestra that would represent the European dream of countries joining together.

Thus was born the European Union-financed European Community Youth Orchestra, later renamed the EU Youth Orchestra (EUYO). Led by such maestros as Claudio Abbado, Vladimir Ashkenazy, Leonard Bernstein, and Daniel Barenboim, with its 140 young musicians (ages 14 to 24) performing around the world, it became what EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker called “one of our most distinguished ... ambassadors” and “a potent symbol of our European Union.”

But this past spring, as the upcoming “Brexit” referendum was threatening to take Britain out of the EU, the EU Commission dealt what amounted to a death blow to the orchestra, saying it would stop funding it. 

This came at a troubled time for arts in Europe, says Andreas Masopust, deputy chief executive officer of the German Orchestra Union. For example, the choir and orchestra of the Rome Opera were almost let go in 2014, and the Symphony Orchestra of Cordoba in Spain saw its budget cut by 40 percent the same year, according to Mr. Masopust.

The effort to keep the EUYO alive included musicians from the EUYO and others performing Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” on May 20 in cities including Vienna, Berlin, and Brussels. In early June, the European Commission announced it had discovered ways to continue funding the EUYO. In a statement, the EUYO said that “the Orchestra looks forward to working in detail on these proposals.... The Orchestra is aware that only when the precise details of these proposals are confirmed by both the Commission and the EUYO can the future of the Orchestra be said to be assured.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.