Japanese music continues to win over North America

Japanese acts including Babymetal and Perfume have recently become the newest music groups from the country to find fans in the US.

Myles Wright/Zuma/Newscom
BabyMetal performs as the special guest at the Leeds Festival.

Through the years, Japanese musicians have achieved North American success in waves. From Kyu Sakamoto’s No. 1 single in 1963 (“Sukiyaki”) and Yellow Magic Orchestra’s cult technopop in the late 1970s to Shonen Knife’s ’90s-era punky power trio sounds and Puffy AmiYumi’s melodic 21st-century indie rock, Japanese music in various genres has successfully crossed over decade by decade.

Less than halfway through the year, 2016 has already proved to be a breakthrough year for Japanese popular music. Beginning in late April, the Hatsune Miku Expo North America Tour presented 14 shows in 10 cities. Several 3-D virtual pop stars, including the titular Hatsune Miku, performed.

Meanwhile, many previously uninitiated Babymetal fans got their first exposure to the J-pop-meets-speed-metal trio through the group’s appearance on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” in early April. The band’s sophomore release, “Metal Resistance,” became the first Japanese-language album to reach the top 40 of the Billboard albums chart in more than 50 years. Babymetal commences a five-city US tour on July 12 in Seattle.

And the group Perfume, a three-piece pure J-pop vocal group, is reviving Japan’s synthpop tradition. The trio is doing five shows at four stops in the United States starting with one in Los Angeles on Aug. 26.

“Japanese pop culture, if you look at the size of anime conventions around the country, has become pretty mainstream – not just in major cities,” Keith Cahoon, former director of iTunes Japan, says. “And anime has helped bring Japanese pop music to the US.”

All three acts – Hatsune Miku, Babymetal, and Perfume – present fresh approaches to mostly familiar musical forms, Mr. Cahoon points out. “You see Perfume, it’s not like anything else you would find in America,” he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.