The Beatles: Here come the sons?

Rumors swirl that the sons of the Beatles are considering starting a band.

Chris Pizzello/AP
James McCartney, left, and Jade Nazareth arrive at the MusiCares Person of the Year gala honoring Paul McCartney on Friday, Feb. 10, in Los Angeles.

Be careful what you wish for. Especially when it involves the Beatles.

Reports are circulating that the male spawn of the beloved moptops are considering putting a band together. Hmmm. Following in the hallowed footsteps of the greatest band in the history of mankind? No pressure.

The wisdom of even contemplating such a high-risk project aside, it's not an altogether far-fetched notion. All of the Beatles' boys can play.

Paul and Linda McCartney's son James, age 34; John Lennon and Yoko Ono's son Sean, 36; and George and Olivia Harrison's only child Dhani, 33, all are singer/songwriter/guitarists with recordings and live performances under their belts. To this point, however, despite their famous names, none of the three's recorded output has met with any critical or popular acclaim.

Ringo and Maureen Starr begat two – you guessed it – drummers! Both Zak, 47, and brother Jason, 44, are talented, in-demand professionals. Zak is The Who's drummer when they tour, and has recorded and toured with Oasis as well as his famous dad's All-Starr Band. Jason has played with lesser-known British bands since the 1980s. Apparently neither sings.

Do the "bitty Beatles" talk to one another – are they friends? Not really, though according to James McCartney, the four have broached the idea of a band. "I don't think it's something that Zak wants to do," he told the BBC. "Maybe Jason would want to do it. I'd be up for it. Sean seemed to be into it. Dhani seemed to be into it. I'd be happy to do it."

When cornered on the real chance of a band (and recording) coming of all this, McCartney hedged: "Yeah, hopefully, naturally. I don't know. You'd have to wait and see. The will of God, nature's support, I guess. So yeah, maybe."

Following the widespread speculation and viral hubbub caused by the BBC interview, James McCartney posted a message on his Facebook page to say that he was "just thinking out loud."

Might be wise to just let it be.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.