Disney’s hopeful ‘Raya’ is another leap for female heroes

( PG ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )
Disney+/AP
Raya (voiced by Kelly Marie Tran) talks with Sisu the dragon (Awkwafina) in a scene from "Raya and the Last Dragon."

Female warrior story “Raya and the Last Dragon” features incredible combat scenes and stunning weapon design, but saving the world ultimately comes down to a leap of faith and an olive branch.

The new movie, available for a $30 fee on Disney+, offers a timely message about the power of trust, while inspiring hope for the future of the Disney princess franchise. Played endearingly by Vietnamese American actress Kelly Marie Tran (“The Last Jedi”), Raya is considered Disney’s first Southeast Asian princess, and it’s clear from the start that vivid world-building is one of the film’s strengths.

The story is set in Kumandra, a make-believe land inspired by various Southeast Asian nations, where humans and dragons lived in harmony until the latter sacrificed themselves to protect the world from malicious spirits known as the Drunn. The kingdom then fractured into five warring societies – Raya’s homeland “Heart,” along with “Fang,” “Spine,” “Talon,” and “Tail.” The magical gem the dragons used to quell the Drunn resides in Heart, a point of mounting political tension. 

Why We Wrote This

In the latest Disney princess movie, our reviewer sees an exploration of finding faith in others, and some welcomely complex characters that ought to become the norm.

Fast-forward 500 years, and we meet Raya, defender-in-training of the dragon stone, and her father, the open-hearted chief who dreams of reuniting Kumandra through diplomacy. The film really kicks off when Raya’s counterpart from Fang, Namaari (Gemma Chan), exploits her trust and imperils the dragon stone. The tragic events that follow cement Raya’s newfound hatred of Fang and all the other tribes. 

At this point, “Raya” seems more cynical than your average Disney movie – humans are dying, and they have no one but themselves to blame. That foundation makes the hero’s epic journey to restore not just the dragon stone, but also her faith in other people, all the more rewarding. 

“Raya” is often predictable, but always entertaining. Awkwafina is perfect as the ultra-expressive Sisu, the last living dragon, reawakened to help Raya on her quest. Their charming band of war-torn misfits (including a crime boss baby and her cartel of thieving con-monkeys), the lush animation, and nods to different Southeast Asian cultures are all reasons to watch this movie. Of course, there’s also an argument that the hodgepodge universe promotes a homogenous view of Southeast Asia, rather than honoring the region’s unique cultures – and the movie caught flak for casting East Asian actors in several main roles. Nevertheless, as I watched Raya, Namaari, and Sisu grapple with anger, fear, and self-doubt, I realized “Raya” had done something few films even try – it allowed three well-developed female characters to drive the story.

Still, many have noted the similarities between Raya and other Disney princesses. Like Mulan, who broke ground as the first Asian princess, Raya is a warrior driven by love for her father. Like Elsa in “Frozen,” she carries a significant part of the blame for creating the movie’s main crisis. The movie “Moana” also follows a chieftain’s daughter on a mythology-based quest, and like both Moana and Elsa, Raya has no romantic interest. Although the film’s main takeaway – that the bravest thing you can do is trust others – is prescient and uniquely “Raya,” these thematic similarities have fueled one of the film’s most prominent criticisms: “Raya” is formulaic, unoriginal.  

But rather than rip-offs, I see a series of positive trends changing the Disney princess pipeline: more flawed heroes, more female friendships, more complicated villains, more diversity, and more courage. What we see now is the culmination of movies like “Mulan,” “Frozen,” and “Moana.” Raya isn’t groundbreaking; she’s even better. Raya is the new norm. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.