‘All Is True’ ponders why Shakespeare put down his quill

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

Kenneth Branagh returns to the Bard, this time playing him. With moments of pure poetry, ‘All Is True’ is an honorable try.

Courtesy of Robert Youngson/Sony Pictures Classics
From left to right: Jack Colgrave Hirst, Kathryn Wilder, Kenneth Branagh, Judi Dench, Clara Duczmal, and Lydia Wilson star in ‘All Is True,’ which takes place near the end of Shakespeare’s life.

Has there ever been so much speculation about a life so little known as William Shakespeare’s? The latest entry in the post-“Shakespeare in Love” sweepstakes is the engrossing, uneven “All Is True.” Directed by and starring Kenneth Branagh as the Bard, it picks up at the end of Shakespeare’s life, when, in 1613, he left London following a catastrophic fire at the Globe Theatre and returned to his family in Stratford-upon-Avon, never to write again. 

The film’s title, which was also an alternative title for “Henry VIII,” the play that was being performed when the Globe fire broke out, is a kind of preemptive strike against all those who would question the movie’s inventions and confabulations. 

Why did Shakespeare stop writing? This is the film’s central conceit, and Ben Elton, who wrote the screenplay, is at no loss for answers. It may seem presumptuous to, in effect, psychoanalyze a writer who, perhaps more than any other, plumbed the depths of the human psyche. Still, Branagh and Elton understand that the man who wrote the plays and the man who lived his life are not indistinguishable. Put bluntly, even those who fully fathom the human heart may have trouble fathoming their own. 

The film makes the case that the death, 17 years earlier, of 11-year-old Hamnet, Shakespeare’s only son, was the key tragedy of his life. Hamnet was the fraternal twin of Judith (Kathryn Wilder), a spinster who resents her father – who was away in London for most of their lives – for idolizing the boy he barely knew. Shakespeare cherishes the poems Hamnet supposedly wrote and imagines what might have been. 

The Bard’s flinty wife, Anne Hathaway (Judi Dench), concurs with Judith and goes a step further. “It’s not Hamnet you mourn,” she says, “but yourself.” (This octogenarian actress is marvelous enough to make you forget that, in reality, Hathaway was just eight years Shakespeare’s senior.) The Bard spends much of his days puttering, rather ineptly, in a garden he is dedicating to Hamnet’s memory. In a whopping understatement, he says, “I find it easier to create things with words.” 

Best known for his movies “Henry V,” “Hamlet,” and “Much Ado About Nothing,” Branagh is probably the leading popularizer of Shakespeare among living actor-directors. The challenge of actually playing Shakespeare must have been daunting. He’s a quicksilver, ardent-eyed actor of tremendous spirit. But in this film, he is being asked to scale back his physicality. Plus, he’s outfitted with a massive wig, prosthetic nose, and other unsightly encumbrances.

This serioso approach to the character tamps down much of what is most alive about Branagh’s gifts, but there are compensations. Even as this Shakespeare relinquishes his art, there are selective moments when the artist comes through anyway. This is best demonstrated in a scene where a star-struck acolyte and would-be writer seeks out the Bard in the garden. Shakespeare brushes him off at first but eventually offers this: “Speak first for yourself, search within, consider the content of your own soul, your humanity, and if you are honest with yourself, then whatever you write, all is true.”

An even better example of Shakespeare revealing his true colors comes in the film’s best scene, a friendly hearthside meeting between Shakespeare and Henry Wriothesley, the Earl of Southampton (Ian McKellen), his longtime benefactor and, it’s implied, one-time lover. Their talk has been polite and prosaic, and then Shakespeare gently recites, in full, his 29th sonnet, which begins, “When, in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes.” We realize, if we did not already, that there is no disconnect between this recitation and the mundane-seeming man speaking the words. The poetry resides in him in full. 

The moment is capped when the earl, in a marvelous rendition by McKellen, recites back to Shakespeare the same sonnet. Aside from being a master acting class in dueling poetic interpretations, this sequence is one of the most quietly impassioned dialogues I’ve ever seen in a movie.

I wish “All Is True” weren’t written and directed with quite so stately a hand. There are a few too many lingering shots of Shakespeare gazing wistfully at ponds, and we could have used a touch more of the Ben Elton whose writing credits include the BBC’s Shakespeare parody TV series “Upstart Crow.” But given the impossibility of crafting William Shakespeare into a believable human being, the film is an honorable try. Grade: B+ (Rated PG-13 for thematic elements, suggestive material, and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to ‘All Is True’ ponders why Shakespeare put down his quill
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today