'Shirkers' is a one-of-a-kind reclamation project

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The documentary, directed by Sandi Tan, is a charming, wistful movie.

Courtesy of Netflix

In the early 1990s in notoriously regimented Singapore, 18-year-old Sandi Tan wrote a road trip movie called “Shirkers,” a French new wave-inspired spree about a female serial killer, played by Tan, and enlisted her teenage filmmaker friends in the adventure. The director was their mentor, an American named Georges Cardona, decades older than them. With “Shirkers” shot and awaiting post-production, Cardona vanished, along with the film, leaving Tan and her collaborators crestfallen. About 20 years later, Tan was informed that Cardona had died and that all the film’s footage, though not the soundtrack, had been preserved.

“Shirkers” is also the name of the documentary that Tan has fashioned from this oddball odyssey and it’s a one-of-a-kind reclamation project: part personal history, part fantasia. Cardona, who was something of a con man of genius, emerges as a character Vladimir Nabokov might have invented. Tan devotes almost as much time to him as to herself (even though very little actual footage of Cardona exists), and the overriding tone is a kind of dazed ruefulness. The film makes too much, I think, of what an artistic groundbreaker for Singaporean cinema the original “Shirkers” might have been – from the footage that we see, it looks like a goofy home-movie-style lark – and it’s difficult to feel sadness for what might have been when, if not for Cardona’s disappearing act, we wouldn’t have the current “Shirkers.” It’s a charming, wistful movie, and I trust Tan will not have to wait another 20 years to direct her next film. Grade: B+ (This movie is not rated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Shirkers' is a one-of-a-kind reclamation project
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today