Orson Welles would likely approve of making-of doc 'They’ll Love Me When I’m Dead'

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The documentary chronicles the making of Orson Welles’s film 'The Other Side of the Wind,' which was shot between 1970 and 1976 and is now available on Netflix.

José María Castellví/Netflix
Orson Welles (r.) works on 'The Other Side of the Wind.'

From the indefatigable filmmaker Morgan Neville, who earlier this year came out with the marvelous Fred Rogers documentary "Won’t You Be My Neighbor?," comes "They’ll Love Me When I’m Dead," which chronicles the making of Orson Welles’s “final” film, "The Other Side of the Wind." "Wind" was shot between 1970 and 1976 and was only partially edited. It was beset by legal woes and held in French vaults and labs for almost 40 years. Both Neville’s film and “The Other Side of the Wind” are being released simultaneously in theaters and on Netflix. I would advise seeing Welles’s film first. It’s more rewarding and less confusing that way.

The title to Neville’s film comes from a supposed pronouncement from Welles about his legacy, and surely the bitterness and rue in that statement was pure Welles. He felt betrayed by Hollywood, which, apart from “Citizen Kane” – a movie he called “the curse of my life” – was never a hospitable habitat for his genius. Neville’s film, which draws on interviews with surviving crew and actors as well as behind-the-scenes footage, explores the making of “The Other Side of the Wind” (less so the mechanics of its restoration) but focuses equally on Welles’s mythology, some of it self-made, all of it enthralling. How much of his woes – the botched, unfinished projects, the financial oppressions – were self-inflicted is a matter of debate and perhaps more suitably addressed to a psychiatrist than a film critic. But I have always been partial to the belief that, for all of Welles’s piteous bluster, he was far more sinned against than sinning. One of the saddest sequences in movies is the clip in the documentary from the 1975 AFI Life Achievement Award, when Welles, basking in his standing ovation, slyly, imploringly, all but begs Hollywood for money to complete “The Other Side of the Wind.” Not a dime, we are informed, came through.

Neville includes clips of Welles talking about “The Other Side of the Wind” years before he started production. He intended the movie as his Hollywood comeback film. In several of the clips, shot in the late 1960s, he regales a group of journalists by describing the film as unlike anything ever before seen – a combination of documentary, improvisation, movies within movies, and so on. It’s a tantalizing performance, and he caps it off by saying that maybe the picture itself will end up being “just talking about a picture.” It’s a classic piece of Wellesian reverse-field prestidigitation, but it also lends Neville’s documentary a spooky aura it might not otherwise possess. His film isn’t just a companion piece to “The Other Side of the Wind.” As it turns out, bearing Welles’s words in mind, it becomes almost a meta version of Welles’s movie. I would like to think that the great magician himself would have approved. Grade: A- (This movie is not rated.)     

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Orson Welles would likely approve of making-of doc 'They’ll Love Me When I’m Dead'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today