'War for the Planet of the Apes' is among the best of the series

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The incomparable Andy Serkis returns as Caesar in the third film of the rebooted sci-fi trilogy. 

Twentieth Century Fox/AP
A scene from 'War for the Planet of the Apes.'

“War for the Planet of the Apes,” the third in the rebooted trilogy, is among the best of the series. Nothing, to my taste, beats the 1968 original "Planet of the Apes," but then again, few sci-fi films have matched that movie’s mix of thrills, high camp, and high concept, plus that great kicker of an ending.

The refashioned high concept here has the apes now in charge of most of the planet. However, an incursion of humans, fighting for the survival of their species, has forced the band of apes led by the Moses-like Caesar (the incomparable Andy Serkis) to flee their Muir Woods sanctuary to greener pastures.

Caesar’s adversary – if you don’t count his recurring memories of the human-hating Koba – is the bald-pated American colonel played lethally well by Woody Harrelson. (The brackish scenes of captured apes rounded up in slave camps is as harrowing as the slaughterhouse scenes with the superpigs in “Okja.”) Given the fact that both apes and humans are fighting against extinction, the stakes in their battles are sky high, and director Matt Reeves, a series veteran, never lets you forget it. Grade: B+ (Rated PG-13 for sequences of sci-fi violence and action, thematic elements, and some disturbing images.)

[Editor's note: The original version of this review included an inaccurate description of one of the characters.]


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'War for the Planet of the Apes' is among the best of the series
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today