The Culture Movies

'Cars 3' is reasonably diverting but somewhat sluggish

The movie attempts to bring back the heart of the first installment, but talk in the film of retirement and the good old days will make kids and adults alike fidgety.

Lightning McQueen, voiced by Owen Wilson, foreground, in a scene from 'Cars 3.'
Disney-Pixar/AP
|
Caption
( G )
  • Peter Rainer
    Film critic

It’s pretty well agreed that “Cars 2” was no “Cars.” I wasn’t nuts about “Cars,” either, but after that assaultive and unfunny sequel, I was hoping against hope that the franchise would come to a screeching halt. Little chance of that, since the films have pulled in billions of dollars in ticket sales and merchandise.

So how good/bad is “Cars 3”? If we’re talking Pixar threepeats here, it’s certainly no “Toy Story 3.” Instead, it’s a reasonably diverting, somewhat sluggish attempt to reinstall the “heart” of the first installment, as it focuses on Lightning McQueen (voiced as always by Owen Wilson) as he attempts a comeback after a crushing defeat against state-of-the-art bad boy Jackson Storm (Armie Hammer).

Brian Fee, taking over from previous director John Lasseter, brings back some of the stalwarts, such as tow-truck buddy Mater (Larry the Cable Guy) and Lightning’s mentor, Doc Hudson (the late Paul Newman), but the aura of nostalgia that pervades “Cars 3,” with extended talk about retirement options and the good old days, made a lot of the kids at my screening fidgety. Me, too. A feminist angle, with race technician Cruz Ramirez (Cristela Alonzo) primed for the big time, was refreshing. If Pixar and DC Comics can work it out, maybe Cruz can team with Wonder Woman. Grade: B- (Rated G.) 

of 5 free articles this month > Get more free articles
You've read 5 of 5 free articles

Sign up for a one week free trial.

Get unlimited access to CSMonitor.com for one week.

( No credit card required. )

( Or, learn about our Subscription options )