When sparks fly in 'Beatriz at Dinner,' it's entertaining but not surprising

Salma Hayek stars as a masseuse/holistic healer who clashes with a famously boorish billionaire (John Lithgow) during a dinner. Lithgow is so good at playing CEO oiliness that you have to smile.

Courtesy of MPRM Communications
Salma Hayek in 'Beatriz at Dinner'.

The Beatriz of “Beatriz at Dinner” is a masseuse/healer played by Salma Hayek with more than a dollop of dolor. A middle-aged divorcée from Mexico living frugally in Los Angeles, where she works at a clinic for cancer patients, she is so protective of her menagerie of pets that she keeps a goat tethered in her bedroom at night. When her car breaks down while she is tending to a private client in a swanky mansion in Newport Beach, Calif., the lady of the house (Connie Britton), whose daughter Beatriz once expertly nursed, invites her to stay for dinner. The only problem: Headlining the guest list is Doug Strutt (John Lithgow), a famously boorish billionaire whose extensive and heavily documented corporate malfeasances inevitably clash with Beatriz’s far-left politics.

Strutt (great name) starts out by mistaking Beatriz for a maid, and things go downhill from there. The movie itself, directed by Miguel Arteta and written by Mike White, remains on a fairly even keel throughout, except for its cop-out magical realist ending, but the contretemps between Beatriz and Strutt is so inevitable that watching the sparks fly, while entertaining, is never surprising. Hayek gives one of her better performances, though – she makes it clear that Beatriz may be righteous, but she’s also more than a bit unhinged – and Lithgow is so good at playing CEO oiliness that you have to smile. He’s the man you love to hate. Grade: B- (Rated R for language and a scene of violence.)  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to When sparks fly in 'Beatriz at Dinner,' it's entertaining but not surprising
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2017/0609/When-sparks-fly-in-Beatriz-at-Dinner-it-s-entertaining-but-not-surprising
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe