'Alien: Covenant' is more interesting than 'Prometheus' but still a retread

In 'Covenant,' the only protagonist of any interest is Michael Fassbender’s humanoid. The film stars Billy Crudup and Katherine Waterston.

Mark Rogers/Twentieth Century Fox/AP
This image released by Twentieth Century Fox shows Katherine Waterston in a scene from "Alien: Covenant."

Why do directors who kicked off famous franchises feel the need to keep returning to the scene of the crime? There is, of course, the dubious example of Steven Spielberg and the “Indiana Jones” movies. And then there is Ridley Scott, who has followed his lackluster “Alien” prequel, “Prometheus,” with the only marginally more interesting “Alien: Covenant.” But we’re still essentially in the Land of Retread: An outer space voyage turns grisly-ghastly as gloppy, befanged creatures invade the crew’s innards and pop out – gotcha! – right on cue.

Along for the ride on the spaceship Covenant, supposedly bound for an idyllic new planet where its happy inhabitants can freely propagate, are commander Oram (Billy Crudup), who makes a point of stating he is a man of faith, thus reinforcing the certainty that he will get his comeuppance in the godless intergalactic void, and his mate, Daniels (Katherine Waterston), who doesn’t invite favorable comparison with Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley. (In Waterston’s defense, who could?) If this is your idea of a good time, you can tick away the film’s two-plus hours guessing which crew members will get offed, and in what order (the actors include Danny McBride and Amy Seimetz), but the only protagonist of any interest is Michael Fassbender’s humanoid, a kind of ambulatory HAL, but much kinder – at least until his double, who appeared in “Prometheus,” turns up. This development ultimately leads to a switcheroo ending that only the dimmest in the audience will fail to foresee. Grade: C (Rated R for sci-fi violence, bloody images, language, and some sexuality/nudity.) 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Alien: Covenant' is more interesting than 'Prometheus' but still a retread
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2017/0519/Alien-Covenant-is-more-interesting-than-Prometheus-but-still-a-retread
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe