'The Zookeeper's Wife' has a strong story but is unadventurous

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The film stars Jessica Chastain as Antonina Zabinski, a real-life figure who, along with her husband, ran the Warsaw Zoo during World War II and managed to shelter 300 Polish Jews there.

Anne Marie Fox/Focus Features/AP
Jessica Chastain stars in a scene from ‘The Zookeeper's Wife.’

If the true story behind Niki Caro’s “The Zookeeper’s Wife” were not so strong, the film would be even less compelling than it is. It’s a singularly unadventurous piece of filmmaking about Antonina Zabinski (Jessica Chastain) and her husband, Jan (Johan Heldenbergh), who ran the Warsaw Zoo during World War II and managed to shelter 300 Polish Jews there, almost all of whom survived the Holocaust.

How this was managed is truly inspiring, but the way it plays out in Angela Workman’s script (adapted from Diane Ackerman's bestseller) is strictly by the numbers. Antonina is righteously earnest, even when she endures being pawed by chief Nazi zoologist Lutz Heck (Daniel Brühl); the Jewish hideaways are for the most part undifferentiated sufferers; and prize animals are slaughtered on cue. This story is powerful enough without our being heavily coaxed all the time how to feel. Grade: C (Rated PG-13 for thematic elements, disturbing images, violence, brief sexuality, nudity, and smoking.) 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'The Zookeeper's Wife' has a strong story but is unadventurous
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today