Oscar nominations: Could 'La La Land' actually win?

Oscar nominations will be announced on Jan. 24. The movie musical, starring Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling, lacks a connection to a widely known stage play but still managed to become a surprising box office success. 

Dale Robinette/Lionsgate/AP
'La La Land' stars Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling.

As the announcement of the 2017 Oscar nominations approach, the musical “La La Land” is expected to receive nods in multiple categories. Could the movie win Best Picture as well?

“La La Land,” which stars Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling, tells the story of an aspiring actress and a jazz pianist who meet and fall in love in Los Angeles. The film is directed by Damien Chazelle of “Whiplash.” 

It's already succeeded with audiences. The film continues to do well financially, with “La La Land” ranking at No. 5 domestically for the weekend after having debuted in limited release in early December. 

Variety writer Brent Lang wrote in December, after the film began setting records in limited release, “In this atmosphere of post-election malaise, ‘La La Land,’ an ebullient, big-hearted romance, seems like an antidote.”

Mr. Lang points out the film's success was far from a sure thing. “Ever since the Woodstock era, however, musicals have faced an uncertain box office reception,” he writes. “More recent releases such as ‘Les Miserables’ and ‘Chicago’ have scored with audiences, but they’ve been helped in part by Oscar love. They had another point working on their behalf: those movies were adapted from widely known stage shows," whereas  "La La Land" "was a leap of faith."

Yet audiences responded.

The movie has already been honored many times by those behind film awards, with “La, La Land” setting a record for the amount of Golden Globes received by one film. Mr. Gosling and Ms. Stone are also nominated for best actor and actress at the Screen Actors Guild Awards. 

It will be a surprise if the film doesn’t receive various Oscar nominations on Tuesday. So as the big night approaches, does it have a good chance of winning the big Best Picture prize? 

The film’s genre may in fact work against it. Movie fans may remember some musical films that at least received Best Picture nominations within the past couple of decades – “Les Misérables” (2012) and “Moulin Rouge!” (2001) were nominated and “Chicago” (2002) won – but historically, Hollywood Reporter Gregg Kilday writes, the genre can have a tough time at the Academy Awards. Mr. Kilday points out that the 1952 classic “Singin’ in the Rain” received just two nominations, one for best score and one for best supporting actress for Jean Hagen.

“Oscar's never been much of a song-and-dance man,” Kilday writes. “Why has Oscar so often given musicals and musical performers such short shrift? Possibly because they make it look too easy. Or maybe because they look as if they simply are having too much fun.”

Out of the 88 movies that have won Best Picture, nine are musicals. 

However, one of the likely advantages the film has is the fact that it takes place in Los Angeles and much of the story is about the entertainment business, with Stone as hopeful actress Mia going on auditions. 

Awards often highlight movies that depict the business, writes Los Angeles Times writer Susan King. “Hollywood has always loved Hollywood during awards season,” Ms. King writes, citing examples such as 2011’s “The Artist,” which took place during the silent film period in Hollywood and won Best Picture, among other prizes. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.