'Split' doesn't deviate from director-writer M. Night Shyamalan's standard fare

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Split' stars James McAvoy as a man with dissociative identity disorder who has kidnapped three teenage girls. Betty Buckley co-stars.

Linda Kallerus/Universal Pictures/AP
'Split' stars James McAvoy (l.) and Betty Buckley (r.).

Ever since he made “The Sixth Sense,” his one good movie and far and away his biggest hit, writer-director M. Night Shyamalan has been attempting to rekindle the fire. “Split,” his latest foray into heebie-jeebie hokum, has at least some novelty going for it. James McAvoy plays a character with dissociative identity disorder (DID), which, in movie terms, means we get to watch him play out multiple personalities ranging from flamboyant fashion designer to frightened 9-year- old. All in all, this guy has 23 separate personas, with a dreaded 24th on the horizon. About eight or so personas are actually on display, and that’s plenty. I worried Shyamalan might go for the full 24 – all of which, for all I know, may end up as extras on an extended-play DVD director’s cut.

Aside from McAvoy’s tour de force, which eventually and unintentionally devolves into a tour de farce, “Split” is an unseemly chamber of horrors. The DID character has kidnapped a trio of nubile teenage girls and trapped them in a storagelike underground facility in order to carry out something unspecified and nefarious. The most industrious of the trio, played by Anya Taylor-Joy, spends much of the movie expanding her big brown eyes in fear. The guy’s psychiatrist, played by Betty Buckley, is on speaking terms with all 23 personas and thinks that DID represents some kind of supernatural evolution of the human species. Guess where she ends up?

Shyamalan is a one-trick pony who needs to find a new rodeo. Grade: C- (Rated PG-13 for disturbing thematic content and behavior, violence and some language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.