'Allied' is lackluster and without suspense

'Allied' stars Brad Pitt and Marion Cotillard, two secret operatives working during World War II who become romantically involved.

Daniel Smith/Paramount Pictures/AP
'Allied' stars Marion Cotillard (l.) and Brad Pitt (r.).

I would have thought that Brad Pitt and Marion Cotillard would be capable of generating a lot more heat than the tiny sputtering flame occasionally visible in “Allied,” a lackluster World War II espionage drama directed by Robert Zemeckis and written by Steven Knight without producing the slightest tingle of suspense. 

Pitt plays Max Vatan, a secret operative from Canada who works in the British special operations, where he is teamed in Morocco – Casablanca, no less! – with Marianne Beauséjour (Cotillard), an operative assigned to pose as his wife.

Inevitably, as the scene shifts to London, these two develop real feelings for each other – the fake lovebirds become real ones, complete with marriage and a baby daughter. But the war is still raging and Allied secrets are inexplicably being leaked to the Germans. Is Marianne the culprit? It’s a measure of the film’s dullness that the answer to that question is far from pressing. Grade: C (Rated R for violence, some sexuality/nudity, language and brief drug use.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Allied' is lackluster and without suspense
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today