'American Pastoral' is grueling and thin

'Pastoral' is directed by and stars Ewan McGregor as protagonist Swede Levov, whose daughter (Dakota Fanning) becomes a member of the Weather Underground. Jennifer Connelly co-stars.

Richard Foreman/Lionsgate
Ewan McGregor (l.) and Jennifer Connelly appear in ‘American Pastoral.’

The title of Philip Roth’s seething 1997 novel, “American Pastoral,” is barbed. It’s a book about how the American dream morphed into a nightmare in the decades following World War II. It’s an overarchingly ambitious work that, in recounting the tragedy of a seemingly picture-perfect family, attempts to corral all the political, social, and racial conflicts that were tearing the United States apart. 

It should come as no surprise, I suppose, that the movie that has been made from Roth’s novel, starring and directed by Ewan McGregor and adapted by John Romano, is insufficient. There is simply too much ground to cover. To make matters worse, a lot of that ground was novelistically rendered by Roth in ways that don’t translate well to film. Interior psychological states, delivered as narrative, are the book’s bloodstream. 

But even allowing for these impediments, why did the film have to be so bland? It’s as if a swirling oil painting had been turned into a paint-by-numbers tableau. The film is a dutiful attempt to convey some of the vehemence of the novel – of the counterculture of the 1960s and early ’70s especially – but McGregor, making his directorial debut, lacks the temperament to do this era justice. He’s an innocent bystander in the melee.

The film takes as its hero Seymour Levov (McGregor), a high school football champion with charismatic good looks. Seymour is known by everyone in the largely Jewish community of Weequahic, N.J., as “Swede.” After a stint in the Marines, he marries Dawn (Jennifer Connelly), an Irish-Catholic Miss New Jersey; moves to a moneyed, rural New Jersey enclave; and takes over the family glovemaking business in Newark, N.J., where the majority of its long-term workforce is black. Their only child, Merry (played as a young adult by Dakota Fanning), has a severe stutter, and, growing up, a fixation on Audrey Hepburn, that icon of feminine grace.

By 16, Merry has become something of a horror – a homegrown Vietnam-era “revolutionary” in the Weather Underground who mercilessly chastises her parents’ bourgeois hypocrisies and steals into New York at every opportunity to congregate with her cabal of fellow radicals. Forbidden to do so anymore by Swede, she takes the war home, bombing a local post office/general store and killing its beloved proprietor in the process. When Merry disappears underground, Swede refuses to accept her guilt and wears down his life seeking her whereabouts. 

The film’s problems begin with its central piece of miscasting. McGregor, a capable actor, does not have the shimmering charisma that the role calls for. (Ideal casting would have been the youngish Paul Newman, or, nowadays, perhaps Liev Schreiber.) Swede’s downfall is intended as a stand-in for the postwar collapse of American pastoralism. His tragedy is the country’s. For this heavy-duty symbolism to work – and Roth overplays the symbolism in the novel – Swede needs to be larger than life. He’s a demi-diety brought low by atrocious circumstance.

There’s a residual poignancy in the way Swede denies his daughter’s guilt until, years later, he finds her in dire straits, aided by the suspect assistance of a fellow “revolutionary” (Valorie Curry) who functions for him as a kind of taunter-stalker. But because Swede is such a tediously suffering lump, our attention inevitably shifts to Merry, who, as Fanning plays her, at least has some fire. She jolts the screen. 

The film offers up periodic newsreel bulletins of the turmoil of the times – Vietnam, Watergate, the Newark race riots – but these serve only to highlight the film’s otherwise anemic attitude. With the exception of Fanning, and Peter Riegert, who provides some comic oomph as Swede’s loudmouth father, the actors all seem frozen in place by the movie’s sloggy, mournful pacing. Connelly’s Dawn, who, unlike her husband, wants only to blot out the past, should be far more poignant than she is here. Even the usually reliable David Strathairn – who, in a small role, plays Nathan Zuckerman, the Roth surrogate and narrator who sets in motion from a high school reunion the film’s flashback structure – seems afflicted by an overdose of somberness.

The entire film seems afflicted in this way. This was also true of the novel, which heaped horror upon horror. Sophisticated as Roth is, he’s obsessed by the startling revelation that American life isn’t like a Norman Rockwell painting. He can’t conceive of any genuine transcendence in the American dream, and the film, with its punishing catalog of woes, duplicates that dubious, insubstantial mind-set. It’s a grueling movie, and a thin one. Grade: C+ (Rated R for some strong sexual material, language, and brief violent images.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'American Pastoral' is grueling and thin
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today