'Denial' star Rachel Weisz: 'I felt it was a very important story for the fight for truth'

Weisz stars in 'Denial' as Deborah Lipstadt, a writer who was sued for libel in Britain in 1996 by Holocaust denier David Irving after she called him a liar in one of her books.

Laurie Sparham/Bleecker Street/AP
'Denial' stars Rachel Weisz.

"Denial" is the true story of a Jewish woman who had to prove in court that the Holocaust had taken place, but it also has a timely message for present-day society, according to director Mick Jackson.

"Denial," which premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, recounts how Deborah Lipstadt, a prominent historian, writer, and professor, was sued for libel in Britain in 1996 by Holocaust denier David Irving after she called him a liar in one of her books.

The case was heard in a London court, where the burden of proof in libel cases lies with the defendant, and Lipstadt, played by Rachel Weisz, was called on to prove that the Holocaust actually happened.

Irving maintained that no Jews had been killed in gas chambers at Auschwitz, citing lack of evidence, and he belittled the claims of Holocaust survivors.

The judge in the case ruled against Irving in 2000, finding that he had not been libeled by Lipstadt.

Director Jackson said the film was timely because it was about fighting for truth.

"If you want to draw conclusions and parallels with what is happening in our story tonight and what's happening in the U.S., in France, in Britain – all of those places where right-wing extremists are taking command of the narrative, just lying like one of the characters in this movie does – it's important. You see this movie and be changed, I hope," he told Reuters on the red carpet at the Toronto Film Festival.

Weisz, who was joined by Lipstadt at the premiere, said she felt a personal connection to the story because her own parents were Holocaust refugees.

"I felt it was a very important story for the fight for truth and the fact there's a difference between fact and opinion," she told Reuters.

'Denial' is now in theaters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.