'Magnificent Seven' debuts at Toronto: Newest restart for Western genre?

'The Magnificent Seven' stars Chris Pratt, Denzel Washington, and Ethan Hawke, and is a remake of the 1960 film. Western movies often seem to be declared gone, yet critically acclaimed entires in the genre have been released in the past decade.

Sam Emerson/MGM/Columbia Pictures/Sony/AP
'The Magnificent Seven' stars Chris Pratt.

The remake of “The Magnificent Seven” premiered at the Toronto Film Festival on Thursday evening, the newest high-profile Western project: a genre which is often declared to be having a comeback, but which may have never completely disappeared in the first place.

“Magnificent,” which is a remake of the 1960 film starring Steve McQueen and Yul Brynner (itself a take on the 1954 movie “Seven Samurai”), stars Chris Pratt, Denzel Washington, and Ethan Hawke, among at least four others. 

The movie is an entry in the Western genre, with the story centering on a group of men who agree to aid a threatened town.

The Western genre is often considered to be gone forever, then revived. Recent well-received films in the genre in the last decade are this summer’s “Hell or High Water,” which has attracted critical acclaim; the 2010 movie “True Grit”; and the well-reviewed 2007 movie “3:10 to Yuma.” 

“People say the Western is dead almost as often as they say film is dead,” BBC writer Sam Adams said, following the debut of “Magnificent.” 

Where the Western seems to have been surviving is in these smaller, well-reviewed films, writes Michael Agresta of The Atlantic. It’s bigger movies like “Cowboys & Aliens” and “The Lone Ranger” that have struggled to find audiences, and therefore not been successes financially. 

“Although end-of-year prestige movies like ‘True Grit’ and ‘Django Unchained’ have broken through to achieve critical acclaim, Oscars, and substantial return on investment, the Obama era has not been kind to newfangled Westerns that aimed for large audiences,” Mr. Agresta writes. “Exacerbating the problem is the rejection of cowboy movies by international audiences, particularly the Chinese.”

Entertainment Weekly writer Darren Franich notes that the genre doesn’t have a massive presence at the multiplex, but believes that some of the best Westerns ever, including “3:10” and “Django,” have been released within the last decade. 

“Westerns aren’t huge,” Mr. Franich writes. “But they also aren’t going away.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Magnificent Seven' debuts at Toronto: Newest restart for Western genre?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today