Are Tom Hanks, Clint Eastwood the right duo for movie 'Sully'?

'Sully' stars Tom Hanks as Capt. Chesley Sullenberger, a pilot who famously saved the lives of his passengers when his plane encountered trouble. The movie co-stars Aaron Eckhart, Laura Linney, and Anna Gunn.

Keith Bernstein/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
Tom Hanks starts in 'Sully' as Capt. Chesley Sullenberger, the real-life pilot who safely landed a plane in the middle of the Hudson River.

Tom Hanks stars in the Clint Eastwood-directed film “Sully,” which opens on Sept. 8, and is the newest movie by both to put forward the idea of a normal person in an unusual situation. 

Mr. Hanks stars in "Sully" as Capt. Chesley Sullenberger, a pilot who famously saved the lives of those on board his plane after it encountered engine trouble by successfully landing it in the middle of Manhattan's Hudson River.

The film co-stars Aaron Eckhart, Laura Linney, and Anna Gunn. 

At the time of the release of Hanks' last movie, "Bridge of Spies," Monitor film critic Peter Rainer noted that the actor excels at portraying the average person who must do what is right. "Tom Hanks [is] in his best man-of-the-people mode," Mr. Rainer writes. "[Hanks' character] Donovan is as steadfast as Gary Cooper’s sheriff in 'High Noon.' "

And while he has also played more morally ambiguous characters, Hanks does have a long line of upstanding people on his list of acting credits, including the 2013 movie "Captain Phillips," 1998's "Saving Private Ryan," and 1995's "Apollo 13." 

Meanwhile, some of Mr. Eastwood's projects in the past have focused on real-life Americans in extraordinary situations, including the 2006 movie "Flags of Our Fathers" and the 2014 movie "American Sniper."

Reviews of "Sully" are so far mostly positive, though some reviewers wished for more examination of Sullenberger as a person.

"Eastwood doesn't burrow too deeply into his protagonist's psyche, other than to visibly demonstrate that he's haunted by the landing," Guardian writer Nigel M. Smith writes.

USA Today writer Brian Truitt agrees to an extent, writing, "Some of the main character's backstory … is hinted at too fleetingly, and what's learned of his personal life is gleaned haphazardly," though Mr. Truitt writes, "When Hanks proclaims to bureaucrats, 'We all did it, we all survived,' it's not hard to feel a little proud re-living a moment of mankind being awesome to each other." 

Yet other critics felt simply that the pairing of Hanks and Eastwood is a great one and the story is told well. "It seems almost a foregone conclusion Clint Eastwood would direct and Tom Hanks would star in the movie version of the story," Chicago Sun-Times writer Richard Roeper writes.  "(Can you think of a better starting battery? I can't.)" 

Meanwhile, Robert Abele of TheWrap writes that "actor/role matching has rarely been as ideally suited as Hanks is for Sullenberger" and that Eastwood's " 'Sully' [is] an honest, skillful rumination on what makes a hero."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.