Why did Dwayne Johnson earn more than Jennifer Lawrence in 2016?

Johnson beat previous champion Robert Downey Jr. to become the world's highest-paid actor this year, while Ms. Lawrence held on to her title. Lawrence has previously written about the difference in pay between actors and actresses in Hollywood.

Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
Dwayne Johnson arrives at the ESPY Awards at the Nokia Theatre in Los Angeles in 2014.

Jennifer Lawrence and Dwayne Johnson have been crowned Hollywood’s highest-paid actress and actor, respectively, as the discussion over wages for actresses continues and Mr. Johnson takes the title away from Marvel actor Robert Downey Jr.

Johnson became the world’s highest-paid actor after earning an estimated $64.5 million for 2016, according to Forbes. Ms. Lawrence, who wrote an essay in 2015 about the pay difference for actors and actresses, took in an estimated $46 million in 2016, according to Forbes

Forbes estimated that her wages from the final “Hunger Games” film, which was released in November 2015, and her advance earnings for the science fiction movie “Passengers” contributed to her earnings. 

Melissa McCarthy, who came in second behind Lawrence, had her estimated payday for the year increase by $10 million, according to Forbes, with Forbes assuming Ms. McCarthy’s earnings for the movie “Ghostbusters” contributed to this. Actress Scarlett Johansson was behind McCarthy. 

The difference of almost $20 million between that of Johnson and Lawrence demonstrates the continuing gap between actors and actresses when it comes to their paychecks. Lawrence wrote in 2015 about her time on the movie “American Hustle,” “[Co-stars] Jeremy Renner, Christian Bale, and Bradley Cooper all fought and succeeded in negotiating powerful deals for themselves. If anything, I’m sure they were commended for being fierce and tactical, while I was busy worrying about coming across as a brat and not getting my fair share.”

Meanwhile, Johnson topping the list for actors may demonstrate a different way to reach the top of this list without starring as a superhero. Mr. Downey came in at number one three years in a row, including 2015, with Forbes attributing this victory to Downey’s paycheck from his work as Iron Man with Marvel.

While Johnson is reportedly set to star in a DC Comics “Shazam!” movie as a villain, that won’t be until 2019, according to Warner Bros. This year, Johnson achieved his number one spot through non-superhero projects, including, according to Forbes, starring in the comedy “Central Intelligence” with Kevin Hart and filming the upcoming eighth “Fast and the Furious” movie and “Baywatch” film.

Ranked behind Johnson on the highest-paid actors list was Jackie Chan, who came in at number two, and Matt Damon, who came in at number three.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.