Why is the film 'Ben-Hur' being remade now?

The newest version of the classic story, best known to audiences from the 1959 film of the same name, arrives in theaters on Aug. 19. Will audiences be interested?

Philippe Antonello/Paramount Pictures/AP/File
The modern remake of 'Ben-Hur,' starring Jack Huston (l.) and Morgan Freeman (r.), comes out on Aug. 19.

Cinema’s most famous chariot race is coming to the big screen again, as a remake of the classic story “Ben-Hur” arrives in theaters on Aug. 19.

The 1959 version of “Ben-Hur” starred Charlton Heston as Judah Ben-Hur, who is taken from his life as a rich merchant and becomes a slave after his former friend, Messala (Stephen Boyd), punishes him for an imagined crime.

The new take stars Jack Huston of “Boardwalk Empire” as Judah Ben-Hur, Toby Kebbell as Messala, and features Morgan Freeman, Nazanin Boniadi, and Rodrigo Santoro. 

Why remake the film now?

The 1959 movie has a religious aspect, as the film concludes with Judah seeing Jesus Christ be crucified. When the news of the “Ben-Hur” remake was announced in 2013, Deadline writer Mike Fleming Jr. noted the religious themes of the film and other movies that were then in production and have since been released, including the 2014 film “Exodus: Gods and Kings” and the movie “Noah,” which was released the same year.

[Editor's note: The original version of this article referenced the wrong movie version of "Ben-Hur."

“The depiction of Jesus Christ as an occasional character in the script puts this project squarely in the mix of Biblical-themed films that are proliferating at studios around town,” Mr. Fleming wrote. The History Channel Bible miniseries was released later in 2013 and brought extremely positive ratings to the History Channel.

And the 2015 movie “War Room,” a contemporary drama with religious themes, surprised some industry observers with its box office performance, with Variety writer Brent Lang writing that the film “reaffirm[ed] the value of producing pictures for faith-based moviegoers.” 

Those creating “Ben-Hur” are most likely hoping to lure in some viewers with the religious plot and others with the prospect of remaking the original movie’s famous action scenes. A trailer this spring emphasized the chariot race, showing crashing wheels and a driver being knocked out of the chariot and dragged along the ground. 

As Steven Zeitchik of the Los Angeles Times notes, the film features not only “the chariot scene, shot mostly in the style of a NASCAR race," but also "a more prominent and evangelical-friendly spiritual quotient.”

Can this combination win over audiences? Some industry observers are seeing trouble ahead, with Hollywood Reporter writer Pamela McClintock calling the predictions for the film's opening “alarming.” 

“Another big-budget 2016 summer event film could be in trouble at the U.S. box office,” Ms. McClintock writes. “Early tracking suggests ‘Ben-Hur’ will open in the $14 to $15 million range … a sobering start.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why is the film 'Ben-Hur' being remade now?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today