'The Family Fang,' the story of an eccentric family, features impressive performances

'Fang' stars Jason Bateman and Nicole Kidman as siblings whose parents (Christopher Walken and Maryann Plunkett) corralled them as children into taking part in performance art pieces.

Starz Digital/AP
'The Family Fang' stars Nicole Kidman (l.) and Jason Bateman (r.).

The maddening ties that bind parents and children are the subject of “The Family Fang,” a mostly successful adaptation of the 2011 Kevin Wilson novel directed by Jason Bateman and scripted by the playwright David Lindsay-Abaire. Bateman also costars, with Nicole Kidman, as damaged siblings Baxter and Annie, whose bohemian parents corralled them as children into taking part in performance art pieces like a sabotaged beauty pageant and a bank robbery.

The parents, in the present-day scenes, are played by Maryann Plunkett and Christopher Walken, who is at his best as the lethally oddball Caleb. The movie captures so well the push-pull of family dysfunction that, after a while, even the Fangs’ extreme eccentricities seem routine. And that’s the point: The filmmakers are trying to demonstrate that, no matter what we think our family dynamic may be, we’re all on the same strange spectrum. 

Bateman is extraordinarily good as the hurt, wary Baxter, a struggling novelist, while Kidman, playing an actress past her prime, makes a convincing sibling. Her performance is less freeze-dried than usual. The film becomes overly inspirational and it does go on a bit – whenever you think it’s about to end it slides into another scene – but it successfully manages the difficult transition from loopy to tragic to uplifting. Grade: B+ (Rated R for some language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.