'Batman v Superman': How Ben Affleck's take on the role of Batman is different

Affleck is the newest actor to take on the role of Batman following Christian Bale and Michael Keaton, among others, starring as the Caped Crusader. 'Batman v Superman' is now in theaters.

Clay Enos/Warner Bros. Entertainment/AP
'Batman v Superman' stars Gal Gadot (l.) and Ben Affleck (r.).

Superheroes are not the only ones seeking redemption in the new "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" film. Actor Ben Affleck also wanted a do-over playing a superhero after being panned in Marvel's 2003 film "Daredevil."

"In the last superhero movie that I played, I was not happy with (it)," Affleck told Reuters. "I just thought it was not up to what it should have been."

In "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice," which is now in theaters, Affleck becomes the latest A-list star to don Batman's black mask and cowl, this time to take on Superman in the sequel to 2013's "Man of Steel."

The two superheroes come to blows over responsibility for the controversial mass deaths of civilians in "Man of Steel" as the public wrestles with what kind of superheroes it really wants.

Affleck's Batman and alter-ego, reclusive billionaire Bruce Wayne, is older than the previous on-screen iterations and also wearier, still scarred by the death of his parents and from fighting thugs in Gotham.

Numerous actors have donned the iconic batsuit, including Michael Keaton, George Clooney, and, most recently, Christian Bale in Christopher Nolan's "Dark Knight" franchise from 2005 to 2012, which grossed more than $2 billion worldwide.

Affleck said he wanted to do a superhero movie "that really worked as a real, substantial, thoughtful movie," and will continue the Batman role in three Warner Bros' films – "Suicide Squad" later this year, superhero ensemble "The Justice League Part One" in 2017, and "The Justice League Part Two" in 2019.

The casting of Affleck initially received mixed reactions as fans debated whether he would live up to Bale's critically acclaimed portrayal.

Affleck acknowledged he was "following in very big footsteps" and said his Batman is "a little bit more of a brawler, he's more physical." He said Batman also would be "contemplative" going forward.

"He's sort of looking for something," he said.

Henry Cavill, who plays Superman, said Affleck's Bruce Wayne harnessed "this jadedness, this world-weariness. It's almost like there's a core of justice there but surrounded by scar tissue."

As Affleck is putting his own imprint on Batman, Cavill indicated he is not done putting his own twist on Superman.

"We're seeing the guy making mistakes, we're seeing the guy having emotional reactions to stuff," Cavill said. "When we get into those final development stages of Superman, then you'll start to see my stamp on the character."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.