Is 'Batman v Superman' a hit with critics?

Warner Bros.' new film 'Batman v Superman' stars Ben Affleck as the Caped Crusader and Henry Cavill as Superman. Is the movie receiving good reviews?

|
Clay Enos/Warner Bros. Entertainment/AP
'Batman v Superman' stars Ben Affleck (l.) and Henry Cavill (r.).

"Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" is facing a rocky start ahead of its Friday release. The tentpole has met with lukewarm reviews and holds a bleak Rotten Tomatoes percentage (which continues to change as more reviews roll in). The last installments fared far better for these caped crusaders, with "Man of Steel" holding a 56% Fresh rating and "The Dark Knight Rises" holding a Fresh 87%.

Although there are a few positive reviews for Zack Snyder's film, most are calling out the film for its messy, less-than-spectacular promised clash of comic-book titans.

Variety's Andrew Barker says this epic standoff never develops fully, and instead "the life-or-death battle between the two icons ultimately comes down to a series of misunderstandings." Barker also believes Henry Cavill's Superman pales in comparison to "the winningly cranky, charismatic presence even when out of costume" of Ben Affleck's Batman. Visually, the film is a win.

Eric Kohn of Indiewire echoes some of Barker's points by calling this messy and "cacophonous" showdown "basically one long teaser for the next installment." Kohn also pointed out that while the film "doesn't lack for inspired visuals" because "it's filled with motion-heavy sequences rich in light and color," a good deal of the story "reeks of the usual routine."

Peter Travers of Rolling Stone thought this was a step up from "Man of Steel" but nowhere near Christopher Nolan's "Dark Knight" franchise. However, even though "Batman v Superman" is probably a dream for most comic-book fans, the "revelation" is the "wowza of a Wonder Woman," played by Gal Gadot.

But Todd McCarthy of the Hollywood Reporter believes the writers threw in the towel on how to integrate Wonder Woman. "With just her sword and shield, she doesn't seem meant to mix it up with these big guys right off the bat," he writes. McCarthy also adds that the lead characters are not fully developed, but may be in the next installments.

Mike Ryan of Uproxx said the movie's inability to provide entertaining escapism on a grim day in world news was particularly disappointing. "I am gobsmacked by just how dull this movie turned out to be," he wrote.

Matt Singer of Screencrush said, "In Snyder's formulation, protecting the world from evil isn't a gift or a calling; it's a burden. And that feeling is reflected in the movie itself, a burdensome 150-minute slog about two men fighting over who is in the right when both are very clearly in the wrong."

Somewhat grim reviews won't necessarily mean this epic caped hero battle will struggle at the box office. The film is projected to surpass $300 million worldwide when it bows this weekend.

"This is basically their 'Avengers,'" said Jeff Bock, a box office analyst with Exhibitor Relations. "There's a ton of buzz about it. They need to open bigger than any DC Comics film ever has."

Fandango reported that it is the fastest-selling superhero film in the ticketer's history, beating out "The Dark Knight Rises" and "Avengers: Age of Ultron" at the same point in the sales cycle.

Warner Bros. and DC Entertainment's "Batman v Superman" marches into theaters Friday.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is 'Batman v Superman' a hit with critics?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2016/0323/Is-Batman-v-Superman-a-hit-with-critics
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe