'Son of Saul' has powerful sequences but is too hypercontrolled

The Holocaust drama is directed by first-time Hungarian feature film director László Nemes and stars Geza Rohrig as a Jew imprisoned in Auschwitz-Birkenau.

Sony Pictures Classics/AP
'Son of Saul' stars Geza Rohrig.

First-time Hungarian feature film director László Nemes conceived of his “Son of Saul” as a Holocaust movie like no other. Set in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1944, it focuses on two days in the life of a Hungarian Sonderkommando, Saul Ausländer (Geza Rohrig), a Jew whose job it is to hurriedly escort newly arrived transports of Jewish prisoners to the gas chambers and then clear out the corpses. (Sonderkommandos were regularly murdered themselves by the SS, after several months.)

When, in the aftermath of a gassing, he sees the dead body of a young boy in the shower, he frantically attempts to covertly reclaim the body, track down a rabbi within the camp, and give the boy a proper Jewish burial. He says the boy is his son, but it’s not clear if this is true: It could also mean that, with this single, valiantly hopeless act, he is trying to preserve his humanity inside this inferno.

At first, with the camera almost always tightly framing Saul as he is herded and goaded by the SS on his unspeakable errands, the film has a muscular force. The headlong rush of horror is dramatized almost matter-of-factly, and Nemes does not offer up explicit images of the carnage, allowing us to fill in our own.

But Nemes’s Saul-centric stylistics grow wearisome after a while, because Saul, blank-faced throughout, never really comes to life as much more than a symbolic martyr. Co-written by Nemes and Clara Royer, the movie doesn’t really expand upon the true madness of Saul’s mission. It’s too hypercontrolled, too limited a conception, for that.

Of course, on some level, no movie about this subject can fail to move us, and “Son of Saul” has its share of powerful sequences. I wanted it to be great, though, with a largeness of vision to match the awful immensity of its subject. Grade: B (Rated R for disturbing violent content and some graphic nudity.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Son of Saul' has powerful sequences but is too hypercontrolled
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today