'In the Heart of the Sea' is serviceable but mostly unstirring

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Sea' stars Chris Hemsworth and Benjamin Walker as sailors whose ship is destroyed by a whale. The remaining crewmen must struggle to survive.

Jonathan Prime/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
Owen Chase (Chris Hemsworth, r.) and Ramsdell (Sam Keeley) give chase to a leviathan.

I’m a sucker for 19th-century seafaring movies, especially ones in which the words “Thar she blows” can be heard above the din. This is not to say that such movies, by definition, are good. Case in point: Ron Howard’s “In the Heart of the Sea,” a serviceable but mostly unstirring adaptation of Nathaniel Philbrick’s eponymous 2000 nonfiction bestseller, which had as its subtitle, “The Tragedy of the Whaleship Essex.” But I’m pretty sure I heard someone from the topmast yell out “Thar she blows,” so that counts for a lot. 

The New England whaling ship Essex was attacked in the South Pacific in 1820 by a gigantic white leviathan, capsizing the ship; only a handful of the crew survived after months lost at sea. Does any of this sound familiar? The film’s flash-forward/flashback conceit, scripted by Charles Leavitt, is that, 30 years later, the young novelist Herman Melville bribes the Essex’s sole living survivor, Tom Nickerson (Brendan Gleeson), to unload to him the true story, as opposed to the whitewashed official version, of what happened aboard the Essex and its aftermath. It seems Melville has a novel he wishes to write but needs a bit more deep background.

This framing device is apocryphal, of course. Melville knew of the Essex but “Moby-Dick,” that peerless masterpiece of Shakespearean proportions, draws hardly at all on the details of that whaling ship’s fate. Essentially, what the two narratives share is a white whale, and the whale in “In the Heart of the Sea,” when it finally flares its flukes, is actually kind of mottled – off-white with greenish-gray accents.

Howard directs the movie as if, except for the CGI effects, he were an old studio hand in the Golden Age of Hollywood. “In the Heart of the Sea” would not look out of place in the same stiff, stalwart company as “Captains Courageous” or the Clark Gable-Charles Laughton “Mutiny on the Bounty” (though not with John Huston’s “Moby Dick,” a far more powerful experience).

The real ocean battle, at least until the big guy shows up, is not with a whale but between the Essex’s clueless high-born Captain George Pollard (Benjamin Walker), whose lineage unfairly qualifies him for the post, and his first mate, Owen Chase (Chris Hemsworth), who by all rights, except, alas, his low-born birth, should be commanding the ship. It’s the haves versus the have-nots, which I suppose has a contemporaneous cachet, as does the film’s depiction of the apocalyptically awful lengths people will go to in order to keep their homes heated. (Just substitute fossil fuels for whale oil.) But thankfully Howard doesn’t push the then-and-now comparisons, preferring to stick with more palatable material, such as the young Nickerson (Tom Holland) descending into the gross, gooey innards of a harpooned whale. Later on, the men, lost at sea, cozy up to cannibalism. 

The white whale of this movie is a “Jaws”-style attack machine, so I guess there’s an eco-terrorist side to this story as well. The whale is telling the Essex crew in no uncertain terms not to mess with Mother Nature. Despite Chase’s stirring exhortations – my favorite: “As I live and breathe, he’s mine!” – I often found myself rooting for the whale. I never felt this way about the great white shark in “Jaws,” except, possibly, when he dined on Robert Shaw.

They don’t make these kinds of “Thar she blows” movies much anymore, at least not unless they star Russell Crowe, so I guess there are nostalgic pleasures to be had here. The film is uninspiringly OK, and if you close your eyes, or, better yet, if you open them, you might just believe you had been transported back to 1930s Hollywood. If the movie accomplishes nothing else, though, I hope it inspires the curious to actually sit down and finally read “Moby-Dick.” It’s an extraordinary yarn. Really. Grade: C+ (Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of action and peril, brief startling violence, and thematic material.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'In the Heart of the Sea' is serviceable but mostly unstirring
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today