'We Come as Friends' opens a wide window into South Sudan

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

Director Hubert Sauper’s previous film, the Oscar-nominated 'Darwin’s Nightmare,' was about economic exploitation in Tanzania and this one is is about the formation of the world’s newest country, South Sudan.

Courtesy of Hubert Sauper/BBC Worldwide North America
A woman from the Dinka tribe is among the South Sudanese introduced in the documentary ‘We Come as Friends.’

If you thought colonialism was a thing of the past, then check out Austrian filmmaker Hubert Sauper’s infuriating documentary “We Come as Friends.” Sauper’s previous film, the Oscar-nominated “Darwin’s Nightmare,” was about economic exploitation in Tanzania. “We Come as Friends,” which could serve as that film’s companion piece, is about the formation of the world’s newest country, South Sudan, which was created after a 2011 referendum that split the predominantly Christian south from the rest of Sudan, which is primarily Muslim. 

Sauper began working on this film six years ago, not knowing if South Sudan would become its own country. We first see him arriving in the south in a rickety airplane nicknamed Sputnik. To the skeptical villagers he says, through an interpreter, “We come as friends.” The villagers, of course, remain wary – this is a refrain Africans have heard from Western interlopers for generations. A new chapter here is that, with the widening involvement of Chinese oil interests in Sudan, the exploiters are now also Asian. Sauper lays out the Sudanese situation for us in all its maddening complexity. The infighting and disarray in South Sudan leave it vulnerable to foreign adventurism. African leaders must align themselves with outside interests in order to remain in power. At his official functions, South Sudan’s first president, Salva Kiir Mayardit, wears a big black cowboy hat, a gift from President George W. Bush; the leader of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, cozies up to China. (Bashir, of course, has been accused of instigating genocide.)  

The great sorrow hanging over this film is that, despite all the progressive talk bandied about by voices ranging from United Nations emissaries to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, not a great deal has changed for the Sudanese in this supposedly post-colonialist era. We hear impoverished villagers wail about how an oil facility operated by the Chinese has poisoned their drinking water and how their sacred ancestral lands have been taken away from them.

Referring to the Sudanese, a young, fresh-faced British bomb-disposal expert says, “There must be a reason why they’re still 200 years behind the rest of the world.” He surmises that “they want it that way.” A Chinese oil technician, driving to work, surveys the fetid terrain en route and declares that “environmental protection” is the “responsibility” of the Sudanese. American Evangelicals, proffering solar-powered Bibles, scoff at the village children running around naked, although at least they recognize that in Genesis Adam and Eve were “naked but not ashamed.” Clinton’s pronouncements that “the Africans will profit” from outside investments seem, in the context of what we are seeing, either deeply disingenuous or deeply cynical.

The scene that haunts me most comes near the end, when an elder is confronted by some fellow villagers about a deal in which he uncomprehendingly signed away full rights to 600,000 hectares of land for $25,000. This is the same man who proudly proclaims he fought other Sudanese for 20 years to keep the land. The ongoing tragedy in Africa is too nefarious, too complicated, for any one film to do it justice, but “We Come as Friends” opens a wide window into this mansion of horrors. Grade: A- (Unrated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.