'Infinitely Polar Bear' never comes to terms with the story's dangers

It would have been interesting to see what actor Mark Ruffalo could have done with his part of a man with bipolar disorder if he hadn't been encouraged to be puppyish and sweet.

Claire Folger/Sony Pictures Classics/AP
'Infinitely Polar Bear' stars Mark Ruffalo (r.) and Zoe Saldana (l.).

Mark Ruffalo plays Cam, a man with bipolar disorder attempting to care for his two young daughters, in writer-director Maya Forbes’s semi-autobiographical “Infinitely Polar Bear.” His wife, Maggie, played by Zoe Saldana, still loves him, but they live apart. Her frustration at not being able to afford a private school for her girls (winningly played by Imogene Wolodarsky, the director’s daughter, and Ashley Aufderheide) leads her to enroll in Columbia Business School in order to earn a degree that will enable her to earn enough to pay for tuition. The problem is that Cam and the girls will be living together, in Cambridge, Mass., while she commutes home on weekends from New York.

Although Maggie’s decision is depicted as selfless, it could certainly be interpreted as something else; and entrusting the girls to Cam seems fraught with dangers with which the film never really comes to terms. Despite some occasional moments of real sadness and terror, the turmoil in this movie is decidedly on the upbeat. I would love to have seen what Ruffalo could do with this part were he not encouraged to be puppyish and sweet. Grade: C+ (Rated R for language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.