'Pitch Perfect 2' is funnier than the original

The news is all good for this sequel – favorite cast members are back and Elizabeth Banks' scenes as a broadcaster are a highlight. 'Perfect' stars Anna Kendrick, Rebel Wilson, and Hailee Steinfeld.

Richard Cartwright/Universal Pictures/AP
'Pitch Perfect 2' stars Anna Kendrick (l.) and Hailee Steinfeld (r.).

"Who run the world? GIRLS!" sing those irrepressible Barden University Bellas, channeling Beyonce, in "Pitch Perfect 2."

And yes, they sure do run the world.

The highly anticipated sequel to the 2012 surprise hit "Pitch Perfect" is now, more than ever, a celebration of girl power, girl bonding, girl harmony, and most of all, girl laughs. As the Beyonce song goes on to say, "Boy, don't even try to touch this."

That should be good news for the many, many young women who loved the infectious "Pitch Perfect." And really, all the news is good about this sequel: It is, if anything, funnier than the original. It brings back all your favorite folks, most notably the sweetly geeky and adorable Anna Kendrick and the bawdy, nothing-is-sacred Rebel Wilson, whose Fat Amy gets more screen time and makes the most of it.

There's also a new addition, Hollywood it-girl Hailee Steinfeld as an aspiring songwriter. Aside from injecting new blood into the Bellas, she's pretty much the only one who doesn't graduate college by the end of the movie – significant for future sequels.

The other important change of note is that "Pitch Perfect 2" is directed by actress Elizabeth Banks, who also produces AND reprises her role as Gail, half of one of the most hilarious broadcast teams ever conceived, real or fictional. Her scenes with the cheerfully racist and sexist John (a sublime John Michael Higgins), narrating the Bellas' various competitions, are the film's highlight. 

We begin with our Bellas giving a command performance at Lincoln Center for President Barack Obama's birthday, no less, but a mishap during the show means the disgraced Bellas are suspended from competition. The ever-practical Beca (Kendrick) finds a loophole: if they can win the WORLD championships, will they be reinstated? Sure, they're told, like THAT would ever happen.

Their biggest competition: Das Sound Machine. These European champions are terrifying in their perfection, their production values, and their general awesomeness — and their disdain for the Bellas. "I don't speak Loser, what did you say?" their lead singer (an imposing Birgitte Hjort Sorensen) says icily. 

The groups first compete at an epic "riff-off" which recalls one in the first movie, only much more elaborate, as happens in sequels. Among the groups competing: the Green Bay Packers. Yes, THOSE Green Bay Packers. (Turns out they're huge fans of the franchise, and not too shabby at a cappella.)

The Bellas sure have their work cut out for them. Meanwhile, busy Beca's secretly moonlighting with an internship at a recording studio. (By the way: do these people ever have, like, schoolwork?) She's also still dating boyfriend Jesse (Skylar Astin), but the relationship feels like a total afterthought here.

The script by Kay Cannon and Mickey Rapkin keeps the rapid-fire jokes coming. A throwaway reference to Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor is hysterical. Much less funny is a no-means-yes sex joke; we could have done without that one, particularly in a college setting.

It all comes down to a huge final confrontation before thousands of fans. It's panache and polish (Das Sound Machine) vs. spunk and spirit (the Bellas). And, of course, these girls have a few surprises up their sleeves. Remember what Beyonce asked:

"Who run the world? Girls!"

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.