'Forbidden Films' raises interesting moral arguments

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Films' centers on the Nazi-produced movies that are still banned in Germany from public showings or broadcasts. 

Courtesy of Zeitgeist Films
A scene from the 1941 Nazi propaganda film 'Homecoming' by Gustav Ucicky as seen in 'Forbidden Films.'

The documentary “Forbidden Films: The Hidden Legacy of Nazi Films,” directed by Felix Moeller, is about the 40 Nazi-produced movies that, except for closely monitored screenings in a scholarly context, are still banned in Germany from public showings or broadcasts.  

Some of the films, such as the notorious “The Eternal Jew” and “Jew Süss,” which was more popular in Germany in its day than “Titanic” was in the 1990s, are well known. But the documentary also includes clips from a range of anti-Russian/Polish/British/French propaganda films, as well as a pro-euthanasia melodrama, with talking-heads commentary mostly from German film historians and filmmakers (including Margarethe von Trotta). 

The film raises the question: Should these films – some of which, crude as they are, are still poisonous – be made available to the general public without restriction? The historical argument, it would seem to me, points to yes. The moral argument is far more complex. Grade: B+ (Unrated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.