'The Water Diviner' is sloggy and heartfelt

A subplot involving Australian farmer Joshua Connor (Russell Crowe) and a romance with a Constantinople widow (Olga Kurylenko) shows that romance is not exactly Crowe's strong suit as an actor.

Mark Rogers/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'The Water Diviner' stars Russell Crowe.

“The Water Diviner,” Russell Crowe’s directorial debut, is a sloggy, heartfelt piece of quasi-magical realist storytelling. Crowe plays Australian farmer Joshua Connor, who can “divine” the presence of water from beneath parched soil. His three sons, as we see in flashback, have been been missing and are presumed dead in the infamous failed offensive four years earlier on the Gallipoli peninsula in Turkey in 1915. The loss drives Joshua’s wife to ruination. He vows at her gravesite to journey to the battlefield and locate their bones for consecration. 

It would have been enough if Crowe and his screenwriters, Andrew Knight and Andrew Anastasios, had simply dramatized the doggedness of a despairing father as he attempts to “divine” his sons' remains. But there is also a woozy subplot involving Joshua and a preposterously beautiful Constantinople widow (Olga Kurylenko). Romance is not exactly Crowe’s strong suit as an actor. His looks of longing are often indistinguishable from his stolid glares. Directing himself only compounds the problem. Grade: C+ (Rated R for war violence, including some disturbing images.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.