'McFarland, USA': Star Kevin Costner is excellent as a high school coach

( PG ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The film plays up all the obvious tropes as a cross-country team makes its way to the state championships, but actors like Carlos Pratts and Ramiro Rodriguez are worth watching.

Ron Phillips/Disney/AP
'McFarland, U.S.A.' stars Kevin Costner (l.) and Carlos Pratts (r.).

“McFarland USA” is yet another movie about an underdog team and the underdog coach who rallies them to glory. The fact that it's based on a true story doesn't alter the fact that, like most such Hollywood movies, it seems fabricated.

Set in California’s Central Valley (home to many Mexican immigrants who toil in the fields), the movie is about Jim White (Kevin Costner), a football coach whose gruff style has cost him so many jobs that this new one, if he flubs it, could be his last. He and his student players are mutually unimpressed with each other. (The boys, virtually all Latino, make fun of his surname.) But Jim realizes early on that, although the players don’t excel at football, they are, thanks to the stamina they’ve built up in the agricultural fields, exceptional cross-country competitors.

Niki Caro (“Whale Rider”) and her screenwriters, Christopher Cleveland, Bettina Gilois, and Grant Thompson, play up all the obvious tropes as the team wends its way to the state championships. A few of the young actors, including Carlos Pratts as the most troubled and most gifted of the runners, and Ramiro Rodriguez, as the team’s mascot, are worth watching.

Costner is excellent, as he often is in sports-themed movies (such as “Bull Durham,” “Field of Dreams,” and “Tin Cup”). He could have sailed through this film but he gives his role an ingrained orneriness and melancholy that lifts the entire enterprise. Grade: B- (Rated PG for thematic material, some violence and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.