'Kingsman: The Secret Service': Samuel L. Jackson is hilarious as the villain

'Kingsman' star Taron Egerton is a serviceable young action star who is recruited by Harry Hart (Colin Firth) to join a secret spy organization. Jackson camps it up as an antagonistic entrepreneur.

Jaap Buitendijk/20th Century Fox/AP
'Kingsman: The Secret Service' stars Colin Firth (l.) and Taron Egerton (r.).

Now that Liam Neeson has paved the way for “serious” Irish and English actors to get all action-y, are you ready for Colin Firth as a superspy martial artist? 

In “Kingsman: The Secret Service,” directed by Matthew Vaughn and based on the popular comic book, Firth’s Harry Hart is an expertly tailored gentleman who is actually a ranking member of a hush-hush spy organization, modeled on the Knights of the Round Table, dedicated to eradicating bad guys. Chief bad guy here is Samuel L. Jackson’s Valentine, a billionaire entrepreneur with a nefarious plan to curb global warming by eradicating large swaths of the world’s population. He’s like a classic Bond villain except he spouts profanity, favors baseball caps, and thinks Big Macs are gourmet food. Camping it up, Jackson is hilarious.

Other big names show up, including Michael Caine as the Kingsmen’s head honcho, but the film centers on Hart’s protégé, Eggsy (Taron Egerton), who gradually transforms from petty thief to superspy as the film periodically explodes in an orgy of flailing limbs. 

Egerton is a serviceable young action star and since this film is primed for a multitude of sequels, he will surely have the opportunity to play the part well into old age. Grade: B- (Rated R for sequences of strong violence, language and some sexual content.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.