'Still Alice' skimps on other characters besides the protagonist

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Alice' actress Julianne Moore is very good as a Columbia linguistics professor grappling with early-onset Alzheimer's disease, but by focusing so intently on her, the co-writing and directing team of Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland skimp on the realities one might otherwise expect from this story.

Linda Kallerus/Song Pictures Classics
Julianne Moore appears in a scene from 'Still Alice.'

Julianne Moore is startlingly good in “Still Alice” playing a Columbia linguistics professor grappling with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Before the diagnosis she appears to have a model life: a caring scientist husband (Alec Baldwin), a dream job, and three devoted children (the most unsettled of them, well played by Kristin Stewart, is a struggling actress in Los Angeles).

Alice’s decline is rendered essentially from her own point of view, but by focusing so intently on her, the co-writing and directing team of Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland skimp on the realities one might reasonably expect from this story (adapted from a novel by neuroscientist Lisa Genova). Alice’s children, undergoing genetic testing for the disease, seem eerily unfazed by the results; this gregarious and esteemed woman apparently has few friends or colleagues to interact with; her husband is the Rock of Gibraltar; and so on. It’s a strange movie – simultaneously rawly realistic and airbrushed. Grade: B (Rated PG-13 for mature themes and brief language including a sexual reference.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.