'Interstellar' is an unwieldy mix of the dystopian and utopian

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The film stars Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway as astronauts who are recruited by NASA to travel through an intergalactic wormhole. The movie's mix of family drama and cosmic esoterica doesn't jell.

Melinda Sue Gordon/Paramount Pictures/AP
'Interstellar' stars Matthew McConaughey (l.) and Anne Hathaway (r.).

In Christopher Nolan’s lumbering sci-fi epic “Interstellar,” starring Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, and Jessica Chastain, Earth has become close to unlivable because of a Dust Bowl-like blight. But not to worry: There are planets we can colonize. First, however, we must pass through an intergalactic wormhole. And then there’s that pesky Einsteinian problem: Those who return to Earth have aged far more slowly than the earthlings who stayed behind. 

Nolan, of the “Dark Knight” franchise, is attempting to make his very own “2001,” but the bloom is off that rose. “Interstellar” is an unwieldy mix of the dystopian and utopian. McConaughey plays Cooper, a former engineer and test pilot recruited by NASA to thread the wormhole, leaving behind his precocious and immediately resentful 10-year-old daughter, Murph (Mackenzie Foy). While Cooper dallies in deep space, Murph, played as an adult by Chastain, grows into an intimidating scientist who still has major daddy issues. (You want to shake her and say, “Get over it!”) Nolan tries to pair the cosmic esoterica with this father-daughter tussle, but the mix doesn’t jell. Visionary movies require a bigger vision. Grade: C+ (Rated PG-13 for some intense perilous action and brief strong language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.